ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P

股前外侧穿支皮瓣术前CT血管成像扫描及重建方案研究

张婷婷, 钟朝辉, 张奥博, 程晓悦, 王振常

张婷婷, 钟朝辉, 张奥博, 等. 股前外侧穿支皮瓣术前CT血管成像扫描及重建方案研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究(中英文), 2024, 33(6): 661-668. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.156.
引用本文: 张婷婷, 钟朝辉, 张奥博, 等. 股前外侧穿支皮瓣术前CT血管成像扫描及重建方案研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究(中英文), 2024, 33(6): 661-668. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.156.
ZHANG T T, ZHONG C H, ZHANG A B, et al. Study on Preoperative CT Angiography Scanning and Reconstruction Plan for Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flap[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(6): 661-668. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.156. (in Chinese).
Citation: ZHANG T T, ZHONG C H, ZHANG A B, et al. Study on Preoperative CT Angiography Scanning and Reconstruction Plan for Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flap[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(6): 661-668. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.156. (in Chinese).

股前外侧穿支皮瓣术前CT血管成像扫描及重建方案研究

基金项目: 首都卫生发展科研专项重点攻关项目(基于超高分辨力CT的耳科影像学新体系创建及应用(首发2022-1-1111))。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张婷婷: 女,北京航空航天大学生物医学工程专业在读博士,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院放射科主管技师,研究方向为图像三维重建,E-mail:tingting01981@hotmail.com

    通讯作者:

    王振常: 男,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院放射科主任医师,研究方向为影像医学与核医学,E-mail:cjr.wzhch@vip.163.com

  • 中图分类号: R  814

Study on Preoperative CT Angiography Scanning and Reconstruction Plan for Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flap

  • 摘要:

    目的:股前外侧皮瓣是一种用于头颈部缺损重建的多功能骨干皮瓣,其穿支血管的位置、走向和来源评估对制定合理的手术计划中至关重要。小视野(Small FOV)技术可以缩小重建视野,增加图像分辨率,提升对穿支血管显示的空间分辨率;双阶段造影剂注射法增强末梢血管的充盈压力;多平面重建(MPR)对感兴趣区域进行冠状位重组,观察旋股外动脉远端各皮支血管分布;曲面重建(CPR)生成穿支血管的曲面图像,将穿支血管曲面路径与旋股外动脉主干容积成像图像融合,确定穿支血管的位置及其走行。本研究旨在通过各种计算机断层血管造影(CTA)扫描和后处理技术提高皮瓣穿支血管的可视化。方法:研究组为我院耳鼻喉头颈外科于2018年1月至2021年8月对13例头颈部肿瘤术后缺损患者行皮瓣术前CTA改进扫描方案。对照组选取首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院放射科2020年9月至2023年4月,为进行双下肢动脉CT非能谱血管成像检查的13例患者,股动脉及其分支血管无明显病变。对两组血管成像质量进行主观评价,并对旋股外动脉的对比噪声比(CNR)和信噪比(SNR)进行客观评价。结果:研究组SNR较对照组稍高,但两组差别无统计学意义。研究组CNR均值为18.25±7.38,对照组CNR均值为7.26±2.64,研究组CNR明显高于对照组,两组差别有统计学意义。研究组与对照组图像质量主观评价无差异。研究组术前在CTA上检测到的穿支血管100% 在手术中得到证实。结论:多种技术综合应用增加皮支血管与周围组织的对比,获得满意的CT图像质量,提高图像分析的准确性,给临床医生分析供血血管的位置、走行和来源提供了更好的技术支持。

    Abstract:

    Objective: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a multifunctional diaphyseal flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects. The location, destination, and source of the perforator vessels are crucial for developing a reasonable surgical plan. The small FOV technique can narrow the reconstruction field, increase image resolution, and enhance the spatial resolution of perforator vessels. The two-stage contrast injection method enhances peripheral vessel filling pressure. Multiplanar reformation (MPR) allows coronal reconstruction of the area of interest permitting observation of the distribution of the distal perforator vessels of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. Curved multiplanar reformation (CPR) generates a curved image of the perforator vessels by integrating the curved path of the perforator vessels with the volume-rendering image of the lateral circumflex femoral artery to determine the location and course of the perforator vessels. This study was performed to improve perforator flap vessel visualization using various computed tomography angiography (CTA) scanning and post-processing techniques. Methods: The study group consisted of 13 patients with head and neck tumor defects who underwent improved preoperative CTA scanning between January 2018 and August 2021 at our hospital’s Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. The control group included 13 patients with no significant lesions in the femoral artery or its branches who underwent non-spectral CT angiography of the bilateral lower extremity arteries between September 2020 and April 2023 at the Radiology Department of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. Vascular imaging quality was subjectively scored, and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the lateral circumflex femoral artery were objectively evaluated. Results: While SNR in the intervention group was slightly higher than that in the control group, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. The average CNR in the study group was 18.25±7.38, while that in the control group was 7.26±2.64. The CNR in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups. No significant difference in subjective image quality scores was observed between the study and control groups. All perforator vessels detected on preoperative CTA in the study group were confirmed intraoperatively. Conclusions: Comprehensive application of multiple techniques increased the contrast between the perforator vessels and surrounding tissues, resulting in satisfactory CT image quality. These methods improve the accuracy of image analysis and provide better technical support for clinicians in analyzing the location, course, and source of blood vessels.

  • 新型冠状病毒感染(coronavirus disease 2019,COVID-19)是由新型冠状病毒引起的一种急性呼吸道传染性疾病[1]。该病起病急、传播快、普遍易感,由于侵及呼吸道不同部位而临床表现多样,根据临床分型,将该病分为轻型、普通型、重型及危重型[2]。影像学检查对其的诊断价值不可替代,目前,大多数学者仅单纯探讨COVID-19的肺部影像学表现[3-5],而极少有文献报道影像学检查对于COVID-19分型的诊断价值。

    本文回顾性分析2022年12月20日至2022年12月31日于我院感染科诊断为COVID-19的134例患者,并根据临床分型进行分组,对于不同分型的COVID-19患者的临床特点及肺部影像学表现进行分析总结,以探讨胸部薄层CT平扫对于COVID-19分型的诊断价值,为临床诊断、治疗提供影像依据。

    回顾性收集2022年12月20日至2022年12月31日期间于北京大学第九临床医学院(首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院)感染科确诊为COVID-19的134例患者的临床及影像资料。入组标准:符合国家卫健委《新型冠状病毒感染诊疗方案(试行第十版)》[2]中的诊断标准,且具有完整的胸部薄层CT平扫影像资料。

    排除标准:不具备完整的临床资料及影像学检查资料的患者,胸部CT无异常的患者。134例新冠感染患者中,男73例(54.5%),女61例(45.5%),年龄26~98岁,平均年龄(69.6±15.0)岁,平均病程5 d,发热126例(94.0%),咳嗽120例(89.6%),肌痛21例(15.7%),咽痛42例(31.3%),胸闷14例(10.4%),腹泻9例(6.7%),纳差3例(2.2%),合并基础病87例(64.9%)。

    134例患者均接受胸部CT扫描,CT扫描仪为32排的北京赛诺威盛Insitum-CT 338机型,扫描参数设置:管电压120 kV,管电流150 mAs,螺距1.0。之后进行三维重建,横断面层厚为肺窗1.5 mm和纵隔窗5 mm,矩阵512×512,FOV 380~450;并进行冠状位和矢状位肺窗(1×5 mm)和纵隔窗(5×5 mm)重建。

    由两名放射科医师分别进行胸部CT平扫图像阅片,结果不一致时由另一位具有10年以上工作经验的高级医师评定最终阅片结果。

    CT主要指标包括:①病变数量:分为单发和多发,多发又分为≤5个、≤10个和>10个;②部位:单肺、单叶、双肺、对称、非叶段;③分布:周围、中央;其中周围分布分为胸膜下和胸膜内,中央分布又分为沿血管束和血管外;④分布优势:上肺为主、下肺为主、周围为主、中央为主、弥漫分布;⑤病变类型:磨玻璃、实变、网格影、蜂窝影、血管束增厚、混合等;⑥病变边缘:模糊、不规则、光整、分叶、毛刺;⑦形态类型:结节、树芽、斑片、大片、束带状、肿块样、混合;⑧其他征象:小气道壁增厚、血管束增厚、晕征、反晕征、铺路石征、支气管充气征、空气潴留征、拱廊征、煎蛋征、胸膜凹陷征、胸膜尾征、分叶征、空泡征、毛刺征、内部索条、胸膜下黑带、胸膜下线、牵拉性支扩、纤维索条。

    采用SPSS 26.0统计软件,对于不同分型的COVID-19患者的临床特点及肺部CT特征进行统计学分析,计量资料应用独立样本t检验,计数资料应用$\chi^2$检验,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

    根据临床分型进行分组,非重症组110例,重症组24例。两组之间合并基础病的差异有统计学意义,且重症组合并基础病(83.3%)的发生率高于非重症组(60.9%);两组间合并糖尿病的差异具有统计学意义,且重症组(45.8%)合并糖尿病的发生率高于非重症组(25.5%)。两组间性别、年龄、平均病程及临床症状的差异均无统计学意义(表1)。

    表  1  134例新冠病毒感染患者的临床特点
    Table  1.  Clinical characteristics of 134 patients with COVID-19
    项目组别P
    非重症组(n=110)重症组(n=24)
       年龄68.5±15.274.3±12.60.090
       性别   男58(52.7)15(62.5)0.384
       女52(47.3) 9(37.5)0.384
       平均病程/d5.05.00.970
       临床特征/例   发热104(94.5) 22(91.7)0.949
       咳嗽100(90.9) 20(83.3)0.465
       咽痛35(31.8) 7(29.2)0.800
       胸闷11(10.0) 3(12.5)1.000
       肌痛17(15.5) 4(16.7)1.000
       腹泻8(7.3)1(4.2)0.920
       纳差2(1.8)1(4.2)0.450
       合并基础病/例67(60.9)20(83.3)0.037
       基础病类型/例   高血压42(38.2)12(50.0)0.285
       糖尿病28(25.5)11(45.8)0.046
       冠心病22(20.0) 9(37.5)0.065
       脑血管病16(14.5) 3(12.5)1.000
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    非重症组和重症组两组之间病变数量、对称性分布、周围为主分布、弥漫分布、边缘模糊(图1图5)、大片状(图4)、束带状、血管束增厚、铺路石征(图6)、拱廊征(图5)以及煎蛋征(图1)的差异有统计学意义。重症组的病灶数量>10个(图7)、对称性分布(图6)、弥漫分布、大片状、束带状(图8)、血管束增厚、铺路石征、拱廊征的发生率高于非重症组,而非重症组的周围为主分布、边缘模糊以及煎蛋征的发生率高于重症组(表2)。

    图  1  患者,男,非重症组,41岁,发热5 d,伴咽痛、流涕、咳嗽,Tmax 38.2℃,SPO2 98%。右肺背侧胸膜下见不规则煎蛋征(亚实性结节)(黑箭)
    Figure  1.  A 41-year-old male patient in the non-critical group had a fever for 5 days, accompanied by sore throat, running nose, cough, Tmax 38.2℃, and SPO2 98%. Irregular fried egg sign is observed in the right dorsal subpleural area (black arrow)
    图  2  患者,男,非重症组,63岁,发热5 d,伴咳嗽、咳痰,SPO2 97%。左肺胸膜下多发斑片状磨玻璃密度影
    Figure  2.  A 63-year-old male patient in the non-critical group had a fever for 5 days with cough and sputum and SPO2 97%. There are multiple patchy ground-glass opacities in the subpleural area of the left lung
    图  3  患者,女,非重症组,74岁,间断发热1周余,伴口干、厌食,Tmax 38.2℃,SPO2 98%。双下肺见不规则斑片状实变及磨玻璃密度影
    Figure  3.  A 74-year-old female patient in the non-critical group had an intermittent fever for more than 1 week, accompanied by dry mouth and anorexia, Tmax 38.2℃, and SPO2 98%. Irregular patchy high-density shadows are observed in both lower lungs
    图  4  患者,男,重症组,68岁,发热1周,伴咽痒、咳嗽,Tmax 39.3℃,SPO2 95%。右肺可见大片状磨玻璃密度影,胸膜内分布,可见胸膜下黑线(黑箭)
    Figure  4.  A 68-year-old male patient in the critical group had a fever for 1 week accompanied by an itchy throat and cough, Tmax 39.3℃, and SPO2 95%. A large flake of ground-glass opacity is seen in the right lung, distributed within the pleura, with a black subpleural line(black arrow)
    图  5  患者,女,重症组,87岁,咳嗽数天,发热1 h,Tmax 39.0℃,SPO2 89%~90%。右肺见斑片状实变及磨玻璃密度影,边缘略模糊,局部可见拱廊征(黑箭)
    Figure  5.  An 87-year-old female patient in the critical group had a fever for 1 hour with cough for several days, Tmax 39.0℃, and SPO2 89%~90%. Patchy consolidation and ground-glass opacity are seen in the right lung, with slightly blurred edges and arcade-like sign (black arrow)
    图  6  患者,女,重症组,83岁,发热7 d,伴咳嗽、咳痰,Tmax 39.0℃,SPO2 90.1%。双肺周围对称性分布片状磨玻璃密度影,其内可见铺路石征
    Figure  6.  An 83-year-old female patient in the critical group had a fever for 7 days with cough and sputum, Tmax 39.0℃, and SPO2 90.1%. The ground-glass opacities are symmetrically distributed around both lungs, and the paving stone sign can be seen within them
    图  7  患者,女,重症组,74岁,发热13 d,伴腹泻、呕吐、全身酸痛、咳嗽,Tmax 37.4℃。双肺多发实变影,沿支气管血管束分布,边缘清楚
    Figure  7.  A 74-year-old female patient in the critical group had a fever for 13 days, accompanied by diarrhea, emesis, body ache, cough, and Tmax 37.4℃. Multiple consolidations in both lungs are distributed along the bronchial vascular bundle with clear edges
    图  8  患者,女,重症组,89岁,发热10 d,伴心悸,Tmax 38.5℃。右下肺胸膜下见束带状高密度影(黑箭)
    Figure  8.  An 89-year-old female patient in the critical group had a fever for 10 days with palpitation and Tmax 38.5℃. A band-shaped high-density shadow is observed in the subpleural area of the lower lobe of the right lung (black arrow)
    表  2  不同分型的新冠病毒感染患者的肺部CT表现
    Table  2.  Imaging findings of different subtypes of patients with COVID-19
    项目参数  组别P
    非重型(n=110)重型(n=24)
    数量    单个    2(1.8)0(0.0)1.000
    多个    108(95.5) 24(100.0)1.000
    ≤5个   14(12.7)1(4.2)0.397
    ≤10个   24(21.8)1(4.2)0.085
    >10个   70(63.6)22(91.7)0.007
    部位    单肺    17(15.5)1(4.2)0.255
    单叶    10(9.1) 0(0.0)0.268
    双肺    94(85.5)23(95.8)0.296
    分布    对称    57(51.8)19(79.2)0.014
    非叶段   94(85.5)23(95.8)0.296
    周围    108(98.2) 23(95.8)0.450
    膜下    76(69.1)21(87.5)0.068
    膜内    104(94.5) 23(95.8)1.000
    中央    95(86.4)21(87.5)1.000
    血管束   95(86.4)21(87.5)1.000
    血管外   10(9.1) 4(16.7)0.465
    病变分布优势上肺为主  14(12.7)2(8.3)0.799
    下肺为主  50(45.5) 7(29.2)0.144
    周围为主  53(48.2) 5(20.8)0.014
    中央为主  20(18.2) 4(16.7)1.000
    弥漫    38(34.5)15(62.5)0.011
    病变类型  磨玻璃   102(92.7) 24(100.0)0.375
    实变    50(45.5)12(50.0)0.686
    网格    87(79.1)22(91.7)0.253
    蜂窝    10(9.1) 1(4.2)0.700
    混合    100(90.9) 24(100.0)0.268
    病变边缘  模糊    62(56.4) 8(33.3)0.041
    不规则   54(49.1) 7(29.2)0.076
    光整    1(0.9)0(0.0)1.000
    分叶    5(4.5)0(0.0)0.585
    毛刺    24(21.8) 3(12.5)0.453
    形态类型  结节    91(82.7)18(75.0)0.554
    树芽    42(38.2) 5(20.8)0.107
    斑片    89(80.9)23(95.8)0.138
    大片    57(51.8)19(79.2)0.014
    束带状   38(34.5)17(70.8)0.001
    肿块样   0(0.0)1(4.2)0.179
    混合    97(88.2)23(95.8)0.458
    征象    小气道壁厚 84(76.4)15(62.5)0.161
    血管束增厚 44(40.0) 24(100.0)0.000
    晕征    80(72.7)18(75.0)0.820
    反晕征   39(35.5)13(54.2)0.088
    铺路石   63(57.3)19(79.2)0.046
    支气管充气征78(70.9)21(87.5)0.094
    空气潴留征 38(34.5) 6(25.0)0.367
    拱廊征   38(34.5)15(62.5)0.011
    煎蛋征   63(57.3) 8(33.3)0.033
    胸膜凹陷征 21(19.1) 4(16.7)1.000
    胸膜尾征  54(49.1) 8(33.3)0.161
    分叶征   11(10.0)1(4.2)0.608
    空泡征   62(56.4)17(70.8)0.192
    毛刺征   50(45.5)11(45.8)0.973
    内部索条  35(31.8) 4(16.7)0.139
    胸膜下黑带 59(53.6)19(79.2)0.022
    胸膜下线  29(26.4) 4(16.7)0.318
    牵拉性支扩 61(55.5)17(70.8)0.166
    纤维索条  75(68.2)17(70.8)0.800
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    COVID-19是一种新型呼吸道传染性疾病,其致病病原体为一种单链RNA病毒SARS-CoV-2,该病有较强的传染性且人群普遍易感[4]。该病发病机制尚不十分清楚,可能是由病毒的S-蛋白与人血管紧张素转化酶Ⅱ相互作用感染人呼吸道上皮细胞所致[6]。其组织病理学包括:肺泡弥漫性损伤,肺泡间隔充血、水肿,单核细胞和淋巴细胞弥漫浸润,Ⅱ型肺泡上皮细胞显著增生并脱落,肺透明膜形成,微血管透明血栓的形成;疾病进展时肺泡腔内渗出实变,肺组织出现灶性出血及出血性梗死,肺泡腔渗出物机化以及肺间质纤维化导致肺泡结构破坏[7-8]。患者通常有流行病学史,临床表现主要为发热、咳嗽、咳痰、咽痛、肌痛、腹泻等[9]。老年人以及合并基础病的患者预后较差。

    本研究按照临床分型将新冠患者分为非重症组和重症组,两组之间合并基础病、合并糖尿病的差异有统计学意义,提示合并基础病的患者尤其是合并糖尿病的患者更容易出现重症感染,这与既往研究结果一致[10],可能与机体免疫能力有关,具体原因和机制有待进一步研究。

    胸部薄层CT平扫对于COVID-19的诊断具有独特优势,其可以显示肺部病变的影像学特征和累及范围,对于COVID-19的诊断以及分型具有指导价值。既往文献[3-5]报道,COVID-19肺部CT早期表现主要为多发斑片状或结节状磨玻璃密度影,双下肺外周背侧分布为主,多靠近胸膜并与胸膜平行,可伴有实变影及小叶间隔增厚,病灶内可见支气管充气征及血管束增粗等表现;随着疾病进展,病灶数量增多、范围增大,逐渐沿支气管血管束从外周向中央扩展,病灶密度增高,磨玻璃、实变或索条影等多种形态病变混合存在,可伴有牵拉性支扩,少数患者可见少量胸腔积液;严重者双肺呈弥漫性病变,实变影为主,部分患者呈“白肺”改变,可伴有支气管扩张、肺结构扭曲及肺不张等改变。

    本组研究发现,在COVID-19非重症组与重症组之间,在病灶数量、分布、边缘、形态、血管束增粗表现上有所差异。COVID-19肺部影像学大多表现为多发病灶,本组研究中多发病灶发生率为98.5%,可能是由于新冠病毒为RNA病毒,需要病毒在肺内达到一定数量才可致病,两组之间病灶数量>10个的差异具有统计学意义,提示重症患者的病灶数量多大于10个,这可能与肺内病毒感染数量有关。

    两组间周围为主分布、对称分布、弥漫分布以及大片状形态的差异具有统计学意义,非重症组周围为主分布的发生率(48.2%)高于重症组(20.8%),而重症组对称分布(79.2%)、弥漫分布(62.5%)以及大片状形态(79.2%)的发生率高于非重症组(51.8%、34.5% 和51.8%),这可能与疾病的发展过程有关,疾病早期,病变多分布于胸膜下和肺外周1/3,这可能与病毒直径较小,可以很快通过支气管首先到达胸膜下气体交换区域有关[11]

    随着疾病进展,病变数量逐渐增多,病灶逐渐融合呈大片状,向肺门或沿胸膜下蔓延至多个肺叶呈弥漫对称分布。两组间病变边缘模糊的差异具有统计学意义,且非重症组(56.4%)发生率高于重症组(33.3%),可能是由于非重症组病毒数量相对少且病毒直径小,容易通过肺泡孔扩散,引起邻近肺泡腔渗出所致[12],而重症组患者疾病进展较快,肺泡渗出增多,病灶密度增高,边缘相对清晰;两组间束带状形态的差异具有统计学意义,且重症组(70.8%)发生率高于非重症组(34.5%),可能是由于重症组患者疾病进程快,病灶此消彼长,呈现形态不规则、密度不均质、类型混杂性的特点[13],平行于胸膜的部分病灶出现机化收缩而呈现束带状。两组间血管束增粗的差异具有统计学意义,且重症组(100.0%)发生率高于非重症组(40.0%),可能是由于重症组患者血管周围间质水肿更重所致。

    既往文献[3-5,14-15]报道,COVID-19的肺部CT表现多伴有晕征、反晕征、铺路石征及支气管充气征等征象,而未有文献报道不同分型的COVID-19患者的影像学特殊征象的差异。铺路石征是指在磨玻璃密度病灶内可见网格影,两组间铺路石征的差异具有统计学意义,且重症组(79.2%)发生率高于非重症组(57.3%),可能是由于疾病早期主要以肺泡壁增厚、肺泡内浆液渗出为主,而间质增厚较少,随着疾病进展肺泡间隔扩张充血、小血管网增多以及小叶间隔间质水肿,从而铺路石征的表现增多[16]

    煎蛋征是指亚实性结节,即中心为实性成分、周围伴磨玻璃密度影的结节灶,两组间煎蛋征的差异具有统计学意义,且非重症组(57.3%)发生率高于重症组(33.3%),可能是由于病变早期结节样病灶相对多见,并且磨玻璃密度结节中心区域肺泡进一步损伤所致,而重症组患者病灶逐渐融合为片状,煎蛋样结节状病灶相对少见;拱廊征是指边缘清晰而弯曲的实变带,与胸膜围成拱形,是机化与纤维化的表现之一[13],两组间拱廊征的差异具有统计学意义,且重症组(62.5%)发生率高于非重症组(34.5%),可能是由于重症组疾病发展呈现更明显的多形性及混杂性,部分病灶内出现纤维化改变,可能表示该处肺组织处于修复状态。

    本研究的局限性:①未纳入临床实验室指标、治疗方法及患者预后等进行比较;②单纯比较不同分型新冠感染患者的影像学表现,未能进一步探讨影像分型与临床分型的相关性;③本研究以患者首诊 CT表现为主,未能进一步观察不同分型患者肺部病灶的动态演变规律。

    综上所述,胸部薄层CT平扫能够明确COVID-19患者肺部异常影像学表现,准确评估病灶数量、分布范围、形态特点,其中病灶数量、分布特点、病灶边缘、形态类型及铺路石征、拱廊征、煎蛋征等特殊征象能够有效提示COVID-19的分型,对于COVID-19的精准诊断、治疗选择及患者预后具有重要意义。

  • 图  1   三维重建定位主要方法

    注:(a)体表定位,(b)曲面重建显示穿支血管走形(起止点未显示),(c)曲面路径与容积重建融合,体现皮支血管走形。虚线箭头为旋股外动脉降支主干,实线箭头为keguan穿支动脉。

    Figure  1.   Primary Methods of 3D Reconstruction and Localization

    表  1   研究组及对照组图像客观评价

    Table  1   Objective evaluation of image quality in study and control groups

    客观评价 组别 统计检验
    研究组(13例) 对照组(13例) t P
    SNR(均值±标准差) 3.98±1.43 3.67±1.93 0.464 0.647
    CNR(均值±标准差) 18.25±7.38 7.26±2.64 5.063 0.000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   研究组及对照组图像主观评价

    Table  2   Subjective image scoring for study and control groups

    主观评价 组别 统计检验
    研究组(13例) 对照组(13例) Z P
    1分 3 7 -1.316 0.188
    2分 4 2
    3分 6 4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   CTA测量与术中穿支血管对比

    Table  3   Comparison of CTA measurements using intraoperative perforator vessels

    患者 CTA识别穿支数量/个 术中发现穿孔数量/个 CTA与术中发现穿支坐标点距离/mm
    1 1 2 1.1
    2 2 3 1.1,1.3
    3 1 1 1.0
    4 2 3 0.4,0.4
    5 2 2 0.6,0.4
    6 2 2 0.6,0.1
    7 2 2 0.9,1.3
    8 1 2 1.1
    9 1 1 0.4
    10 2 2 0.7,0.6
    11 2 2 0.7,0.1
    12 1 2 0.4
    13 1 1 0.9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    FENG S, MIN P, GRASSETTI L, et al. A prospective head-to-head comparison of color doppler ultrasound and computed tomographic angiography in the preoperative planning of lower extremity perforator flaps[J]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2016, 137(1): 335−347. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001895.

    [2] 方利平. 彩色多普勒超声在以旋股外侧动脉斜支为蒂的股前外侧皮瓣定位中的应用[J]. 影像研究与医学应用 2020, 4(12): 7-8.

    FANG L P. Application of color doppler ultrasound in the localization of anterolateral femoral flap with oblique branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery[J]. Journal of Imaging Research and Medical Applications. 2020, 4(12): 7-8. (in Chinese).

    [3] 邓小林, 谢惠, 屈亚林, 等. 能谱CT最佳单能量成像在胃底静脉曲张出血内镜术前的应用价值[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2021, 30(5): 603−609. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.05.08.

    DENG X L, XIE H, QU Y L, et al. The value of optimal monochromatic spectral CT imaging in gastric variceal bleeding before endoscopic treatment[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(5): 603−609. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.05.08. (in Chinese).

    [4] 臧奕恺, 李静, 陆秀良, 等. 能谱CT在糖尿病足部动脉成像中小血管的图像质量应用探究[J]. CT理论与应用研究(中英文), 2025, 34(1)(待刊). DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.130.

    ZANG Y K, LI J, LU X L, et al. Comparison in localization of pancreatic insulinoma by the multiparameter of dual energy spectral CT imaging[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(1)(in Press). DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.130. (in Chinese).

    [5]

    ZHANG A, DONG Y, YUAN S, et al. Preoperative perforator mapping of anterolateral thigh flaps using computed tomographic angiography and visual coordinate system for the reconstruction of head and neck defects[J]. Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal, 2022. DOI: 10.1177/01455613221108367.

    [6] 田皞, 李赞, 喻建军, 等. CTA并三维重建技术在指导游离股前外侧皮瓣制备中的应用[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2016, 24(3): 375−379. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2016.03.010.

    TIAN H, LI Z, YU J J, et al. Application of CTA and 3D reconstruction technique in the preparation of the free lateral thigh skin flap[J]. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2016, 24(3): 375−379. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2016.03.010. (in Chinese).

    [7]

    ROZEN W, RIBUFFO D, ATZENI M, STELLA D, et al. Current state of the art in perforator flap imaging with computed tomographic angiography[J]. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2009, 31(8). DOI: 631-639.10.1007/s00276-009-0484-0.

    [8]

    KUO L E, BIRD S H, LUBITZ C C, et al. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) for preoperative parathyroid localization: A good study but are we using it[J]. The American Journal of Surgery, 2022, 223(4): 694−698. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.015.

    [9] 马振中. 64排螺旋CT多平面及曲面重建在急性阑尾炎诊断中的价值[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2021, 30(3): 400−403. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2021.03.002.

    MA Z Z. The value of 64-slice spiral CT multiplanar and curved reconstruction in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis[J]. Modern Medical Imageology, 2021, 30(3): 400−403. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2021.03.002. (in Chinese).

    [10]

    MARKHAM J C, EDDLEMAN C S, UHRBROCK D, et al. Bending the curve: Preoperative determination of bypass graft length and trajectory with curved planar reformatted computed tomography angiography: Technical note[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 70: 327−331. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318232e119.

    [11] 李英豪, 彭新桂, 金晖, 等. 能谱CT最佳单能量图提高下肢动脉造影成像质量研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2016, (25): 997−1001. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2016.11.017.

    LI Y H, PENG X G, JIN H, et al. The improvement of imaging quality of lower extremity angiography with optimal single energy image of spectral CT[J]. Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2016, (25): 997−1001. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2016.11.017. (in Chinese).

    [12] 孔艳红, 钟朝辉, 张景东, 等. 生理盐水双段注射方法在头颈CTA成像检查中的应用研究[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(18): 8−12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2019.18.032.

    KONG Y H, ZHONG C H, ZHANG J D, et al. Physiological saline double period of injection method in the application of head and neck CTA imaging studies[J]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2019, 18(18): 8−12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2019.18.032. (in Chinese).

    [13] 原媛, 钟朝辉, 王振常, 等. 单心动周期冠脉CTA的个体化三期扫描造影剂注射方案研究[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(5): 97−101.

    YUAN Y, ZHONG Z H, WANG Z C, et al. Study on the application of individualized split-bolus of contrast medium injection protocol in coronary CT angiography[J]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2019, 18(5): 97−101. (in Chinese).

    [14] 李晶晶, 倪瑞玲, 刘文亚. 不同重组视野影响冠状动脉支架成像质量及支架内再狭窄的初步研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2015, 34(9): 211-216.

    LI J J, NI R L, LIU W T. A preliminary study of the influence of different reconstruction FOV for coronary stent imaging quality and ISR[J]. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 2015, 34(9): 211-216. (in Chinese).

    [15] 王鑫宏, 孙建忠, 胡婷婷, 等. 应用高分辨率CT局部放大重建提高肺部小结节结构精准诊断的价值[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(2): 132-137.

    WANG X H, SUN J Z, HU T T, et al. Application of high-resolution CT local augmentation reconstruction to improve the accurate diagnosis of small pulmonary nodule structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2020, 54(2): 132-137. (in Chinese).

    [16] 叶国伟, 方旭, 许兵, 等. CT小视野靶扫描技术在胰腺癌早期诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华胰腺病杂志, 2021, 21(1): 26−29. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115667-20200720-00114.
图(1)  /  表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  341
  • HTML全文浏览量:  41
  • PDF下载量:  114
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-07-28
  • 修回日期:  2024-09-10
  • 录用日期:  2024-09-10
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-09-19
  • 刊出日期:  2024-11-04

目录

/

返回文章
返回
x 关闭 永久关闭