ISSN 1004-4140
    CN 11-3017/P

    双参数MRI定量指标联合PSAD对PI-RADS 3-4分前列腺病变的诊断价值研究

    Study on the Diagnostic Value of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantitative Indicators Combined with Prostate-Specific Antigen Density for Prostate Lesions with PI-RADS 3-4 Scores

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨双参数磁共振定量指标(ADC值及T2 mapping值)联合前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)对前列腺影像报告与数据系统(PI-RADS)3~4分病变的诊断价值,以优化前列腺癌(PCa)的精准分层管理。方法:回顾性分析经前列腺病理证实的PI-RADS 3~4分病变患者91例(PCa=43例,非PCa=48例)。采集所有患者双参数MRI定量指标(ADC值、T2 mapping值)及PSAD数据,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估各参数的诊断效能,通过Logistic回归构建联合诊断模型,并与传统PI-RADS评分系统进行对比。结果:单指标分析显示,ADC值、T2 mapping值及PSAD对PCa的诊断效能AUC分别为0.834、0.865和0.776(P < 0.01)。联合模型(PSAD-ADC-T2 mapping)的AUC达0.899(95%CI 0.837-0.961),显著优于PSAD指标(P=0.009),敏感性达87.5%,特异性达79.1%。另外,联合模型在PI-RADS 3分亚组中的诊断增益尤为显著,特异性提高至84%,与传统PI-RADS评分系统相比过度活检率降低8.7%。结论:双参数磁共振定量指标联合PSAD可显著提升PI-RADS 3~4分前列腺病变的诊断效能,为临床提供了一种精准、可重复的影像-临床融合评估工具,有助于减少不必要的穿刺活检并优化诊疗路径。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of combining biparametric magnetic resonance imaging quantitative indicators (ADC value and T2 mapping value) with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) for differentiating prostate lesions with PI-RADS 3-4 scores, thereby optimizing precision stratification and management of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 91 patients with prostate lesions diagnosed as PI-RADS 3-4 scores (43 PCa cases, 48 non-PCa cases) confirmed by prostate pathology. MRI-derived parameters (ADC value, T2 mapping value) and PSAD data were also collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used in order to assess the diagnostic performance of individual parameters. A logistic regression model was constructed for the combined diagnostic approach (PSAD-ADC-T2 mapping), and its performance was compared with that of traditional PI-RADS scoring systems. Results: Single-parameter analyses showed that the diagnostic efficacy AUCs of ADC, T2 mapping, and PSAD for PCa were 0.834, 0.865, and 0.776, respectively (P < 0.01). The AUC of the combined model was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.837-0.961), which was significantly higher than that of the PSAD index (P = 0.009). The sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 79.1%, respectively. The diagnostic gain of the combined model was particularly significant in the PI-RADS 3 subgroup. The specificity increased to 84%, and compared to the Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring system, the rate of over - biopsy decreased by8.7%. Conclusion: The integration of the biparametric MRI quantitative indicators with PSAD significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS 3-4 prostate lesions, providing a precise and reproducible imaging-clinical fusion tool for prostate cancer risk stratification. This approach reduces unnecessary biopsy procedures and streamlines clinical decision making, thus offering a promising strategy for optimizing patient management.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回