ISSN 1004-4140
    CN 11-3017/P

    DLIR联合MAR在膝关节置换术后能谱CT中的价值

    The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Combined with Metal Artifact Reduction in Spectral CT for Postoperative Knee Arthroplasty

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨深度学习图像重建(DLIR)和去金属伪影技术(MAR)联合应用时,在能谱CT图像中对膝关节置入物金属伪影的减少效果及相关影响。方法:本研究回顾性纳入30例膝关节置换术后患者的能谱CT数据,分别采用自适应统计迭代重建(50% ASiR-V)及3种不同等级的深度学习图像重建(DLIR-L/M/H)进行图像重建,并对每种重建算法应用去金属伪影技术(MAR)再次重建。以10 keV为间隔,重建40~140 keV(共11个单能量)图像,最终获得4组(MAR联合4种重建算法)共计44个图像数据集。通过测量植入物旁感兴趣区CT值及标准差(SD值),计算伪影指数(AI)、信噪比(SNR)与对比噪声比(CNR)作为客观评估依据,同时对图像质量进行主观评分,以此完成图像质量评估。结果:客观评价结果显示,同一算法下伪影指数(AI)均随千电子伏特(keV)升高而下降,MAR-ASiR组AI低于MAR-DLIR各组,其中140 keV条件下MAR-金属伪影去除效果最佳;MAR-DLIR-H组在多个能级条件下,其CNR值和SNR值均优于MAR-ASiR组,且110 keV的软组织信噪比及组织对比度最佳。主观评价结果显示,MAR-DLIR-H组图像质量评分高于MAR-ASiR组。结论:DLIR重建算法联合MAR技术重建的VMIs,其质量优于ASiR-V算法联合MAR技术重建的VMIs;110 keV条件下的DH重建算法得到的图像质量最佳。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and associated effects of combining deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with metal artifact reduction (MAR) to reduce metal artifacts from knee implants in spectral computed tomography(CT) images. Methods: This retrospective study included energy spectrum CT data from 30 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty. Image reconstruction was performed using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (50% ASiR-V) and three different levels of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR-L/M/H). Subsequently, metal artifact reduction (MAR) was applied to each reconstruction to generate the second set of images. Images were reconstructed at energy levels ranging from 40 keV to 140 keV in 10-keV increments (11 single-energy levels in total), resulting in 44 image datasets across four groups (MAR combined with the four reconstruction algorithms). Image quality was assessed by measuring the CT number and standard deviations (SD) in the region of interest adjacent to the implant, as well as calculating the artifact index (AI), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as objective evaluation criteria. Concurrently, we performed a subjective scoring of image quality to evaluate both image quality and diagnostic confidence. Results: The objective evaluation results revealed that using the same algorithm, the artifact index (AI) decreased as keV increased. The AI in the MAR-ASiR group was lower than that in the MAR-DLIR groups, with the MAR-ASiR group demonstrating the best metal artifact removal performance at 140 keV. Across multiple energy levels, the MAR-DLIR-H group exhibited superior CNR and SNR values compared to the MAR-ASiR group, with the best soft tissue signal-to-noise ratio and tissue contrast observed at 110 keV. The results of the subjective evaluation showed that the image quality and diagnostic confidence scores were higher in the MAR-DLIR-H group than in the MAR-ASiR group. Conclusion: VMI images reconstructed using the DLIR algorithm combined with the MAR exhibit superior quality compared to those reconstructed using the ASiR-V algorithm combined with the MAR; the DH reconstruction algorithm yields the best image quality at 110 keV.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回