ISSN 1004-4140
    CN 11-3017/P

    探测器宽度与呼吸配合状态对胸部CT检查辐射剂量及图像质量的影响

    Influence of Detector Width and Respiratory Cooperation Status on Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Chest Computed Tomography Examinations

    • 摘要: 目的:探究不同探测器宽度与呼吸配合状态对胸部CT辐射剂量及图像质量的影响。方法:选取2025年4月至2025年12月在本院急诊行胸部CT检查的160例患者为研究对象,依据不同的探测器宽度及呼吸状态分为4组,每组40例:A组(80 mm探测器宽度屏气组)、B组(160 mm探测器宽度屏气组)、C组(80 mm探测器宽度自由呼吸组)、D组(160 mm探测器宽度自由呼吸组),扫描方向均为肺尖至肺底。比较各组间的主、客观评价,并测量记录下各层面信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)、有效剂量(ED)及扫描曝光时间。结果:4组图像主观质量评分差异有统计学意义。A组、B组、D组评分均显著高于C组,B组与D组评分无显著差异(P=0.462)。探测器宽度和呼吸方式对SNR、CNR均存在主效应,二者无显著交互作用;屏气组各层面SNR、CNR均显著高于自由呼吸组;A组DLP、ED显著低于B组(P=0.012),C组DLP、ED显著低于B组及D组。160 mm探测器宽度组曝光时间显著短于80 mm探测器宽度组。结论:呼吸状态是影响胸部CT图像质量的关键因素,屏气扫描图像质量优于自由呼吸;使用160 mm宽体探测器进行检查可显著缩短扫描时间,患者在自由呼吸状态下可获得与屏气状态相近的图像质量,适用于无法配合屏气的胸部CT检查患者;使用80 mm探测器扫描,在辐射剂量控制方面更具优势,适用于能配合屏气的常规胸部CT检查。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of different detector widths and respiratory cooperation status on radiation dose and image quality in chest computed tomography (CT). Methods: A total of 160 patients who underwent chest CT examinations in the emergency department of our hospital between April 2025 and December 2025 were selected as study participants. The patients were divided into four groups of 40 patients each based on different detector widths and breathing states: Groups A (80 mm detector width, breath-hold), B (160 mm detector width, breath-hold), C (80 mm detector width, free breathing), and D (160 mm detector width, free breathing). The scanning direction for all groups was from lung apex to base. Subjective and objective evaluations were compared between the groups. In addition, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), effective dose (ED), and scanning exposure time of each slice were measured and recorded. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in subjective image quality scores among the four groups. The scores in Groups A, B, and D were all significantly higher than those in Group C, whereas no significant difference was noted between Groups B and D (P=0.462). Detector width and breathing mode had significant effects on the SNR and CNR, whereas no significant interaction was observed between them. The SNR and CNR at each slice in the breath-hold group were significantly higher than those in the free-breathing group, and the DLP and ED in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B (P = 0.012). The DLP and ED in Group C were significantly lower than those in Groups B and D. Notably, the exposure time in the 160 mm detector width group was significantly shorter than that in the 80 mm detector width group. Conclusion: Breathing status is a key factor affecting chest CT image quality, with breath-hold scans yielding higher quality images than free-breathing scans. Using a 160-mm wide-body detector, the scanning time can be significantly reduced. Chest CT examinations performed with patients breathing freely can yield image quality comparable to that obtained with breath-holding. This technique is suitable for patients who are unable to hold their breath during chest CT scanning. Scanning with an 80-mm detector provides better radiation dose control and is applicable to routine chest CT examinations in patients who can hold their breath.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回