ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

CT肺气肿容积及小阴影密集度与尘肺肺功能相关性的研究

赵琪琪 冯莉 刘玉全 王梅芳

赵琪琪, 冯莉, 刘玉全, 等. CT肺气肿容积及小阴影密集度与尘肺肺功能相关性的研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2023, 32(1): 121-129. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.049
引用本文: 赵琪琪, 冯莉, 刘玉全, 等. CT肺气肿容积及小阴影密集度与尘肺肺功能相关性的研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2023, 32(1): 121-129. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.049
ZHAO Q Q, FENG L, LIU Y Q, et al. Correlation between Emphysema Volume and Small Shadow Density on CT and the Lung Function in Pneumoconiosis[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2023, 32(1): 121-129. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.049. (in Chinese)
Citation: ZHAO Q Q, FENG L, LIU Y Q, et al. Correlation between Emphysema Volume and Small Shadow Density on CT and the Lung Function in Pneumoconiosis[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2023, 32(1): 121-129. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.049. (in Chinese)

CT肺气肿容积及小阴影密集度与尘肺肺功能相关性的研究

doi: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.049
详细信息
    作者简介:

    赵琪琪:女,锦州医科大学全科医学专业型研究生,主要从事尘肺影像学与肺功能相关研究,E-mail:874933120@qq.com

    刘玉全:男,十堰市太和医院主任医师、研究生导师,主要擅长呼吸系统疾病的诊断和治,E-mail:lyqliuyuquan123456@163.com

    通讯作者:

    男,十堰市太和医院主任医师,研究生导师,主要擅长呼吸系统疾病的诊断和治,E-mail:lyqliuyuquan123456@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R  814

Correlation between Emphysema Volume and Small Shadow Density on CT and the Lung Function in Pneumoconiosis

  • 摘要: 目的:比较尘肺患者肺气肿程度及肺部小阴影对肺功能的影响。方法:选择2015年至2020年间十堰市太和医院收治的明确诊断尘肺且合并肺气肿的患者96名,进行胸部CT检查及肺功能测定;采用64排螺旋CT(GE Optima CT 680)进行三维容量测量系统定量分析全肺、左右肺、各肺上中下肺野低衰减区容积百分比(LAV%),并根据全肺LAV% 将其分为A组:LAV%<15%,B组:LAV%15%~30%,C组:LAV%>30% 三组,分析肺气肿分布特点及与肺功能的相关性;将胸片评定小阴影密集度的标准应用于CT中得出CT图像的全肺、左右肺、上中下肺野小阴影密集度(SSD),并分析与肺功能的相关性。结果:全肺SSD与FEV1、TLC、PEF、MEF75%、MEF25% 呈负相关,与RV/TLC呈正相关;全肺、左肺、右肺、及上中下肺野LAV% 与FEV1、FEV1%、DLCO、PEF、MEF75%、MEF50%、MEF25% 呈负相关,与RV、RV/TLC% 呈正相关;当LAV%>30% 时,即C组LAV% 与肺功能FEV1、FEV1%、DLCO、RV/TLC、PEF、MEF75%、MEF50%、MEF25% 间的相关性较A组和B组好;肺部小阴影密集度与肺通气功能、容积参数有一定相关性,但与弥散功能相关性较弱。结论:尘肺患者肺气肿程度及小阴影密集度与肺功能均有一定相关性,但肺气肿较小阴影密集度与肺功能相关性更好,且能在一定程度上评估尘肺患者肺损伤程度,值得临床推广应用。

     

  • 图  1  分别为A、B、C组部分尘肺患者肺部CT冠状位图像及轴位图像,冠状位图像由气管纵向水平上用等分点的水平线将左右肺各分为上、中、下3个肺野,蓝色区域为肺气肿低衰减区三维图像

    Figure  1.  Coronal and axial CT images of some patients with pneumoconiosis in groups A, B, and C. The left and right lungs were divided into upper, middle, and lower lung fields from the vertical level of the trachea using equidistant horizontal lines; blue areas present emphysema as three-dimensional images of low-attenuation areas

    表  1  各肺野LAV% 数据表

    Table  1.   LAV% data for each lung field

    数据范围右肺 左肺
    右肺上野中野下野左肺上野中野下野
    -1024~-950/%24.03024.12022.42825.237 23.08023.05319.10526.269
    -950~3071/%75.97075.88177.57274.76376.92076.94780.89573.731
    Total/L4.3000.9841.4561.8603.3840.8431.1281.413
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  A、B、C组组间总体SSD间差异性分析

    Table  2.   Comparison of the total SSD among groups A, B, and C

    项目SSD
    ABBCAC
    M(Q25,Q75)2(1,3)2(2,3)2(2,3)2(1,3)2(1,3)2(1,3)
    Z-0.454-0.373-0.537
    P 0.650 0.767 0.591
     注:M(Q25,Q75)为A、B、C三组总体小阴影密集度中位数及四分位数,组间对比不符合正态分布采用非参数检验得到P>0.05,
       3组总体小阴影密集度对比差异无统计学意义。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  A组各肺野SSD、LAV% 与肺功能指标的相关性分析

    Table  3.   Analysis of correlation between SSD and LAV% of the lung field and lung function indexes in group A

    A组右上右中右下左上左中左下
    SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%
     FEV1-0.0990.019-0.157-0.093-0.330*-0.073-0.2280.132-0.317*-0.203-0.1720.065
     FEV1%0.159-0.0680.0370.060-0.124-0.159-0.0370.005-0.085-0.337*-0.0760.082
     FVC-0.2580.020-0.374*-0.034-0.388*-0.047-0.2960.084-0.501**-0.231-0.385*0.123
     DLCO0.035-0.022-0.007-0.0550.0530.119-0.077-0.0910.011-0.233-0.0790.268
     RV-0.0790.192-0.124-0.0480.0270.070-0.0360.194-0.0820.082-0.019-0.060
     TLC-0.0040.256-0.030-0.030-0.1520.080-0.0100.386*-0.0820.262-0.0020.008
     RV/TLC0.1400.0890.058-0.1990.187-0.1620.176-0.0250.1640.1790.171-0.148
     PEF0.020-0.034-0.144-0.145-0.267-0.083-0.0910.134-0.250-0.253-0.1220.057
     MEF75%-0.055-0.059-0.055-0.127-0.262-0.250-0.0610.048-0.225-0.322*-0.1060.097
     MEF50%-0.057-0.018-0.057-0.032-0.249-0.189-0.1100.048-0.213-0.310*-0.1650.114
     MEF25%-0.1160.040-0.1160.218-0.2510.107-0.0950.121-0.227-0.253-0.2860.106
     注:* 为P<0.05,**为P<0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  B组各肺野SSD、LAV% 与肺功能指标的相关性分析

    Table  4.   Analysis of correlation between SSD and LAV% of the lung field and lung function indexes in group B

    B组右上右中右下左上左中左下
    SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%
     FEV1-0.0530.247-0.149-0.036-0.096-0.314-0.1230.102-0.009-0.211-0.080-0.521*
     FEV1%-0.0240.314-0.1900.025-0.075-0.304-0.0740.128-0.104-0.133-0.147-0.615*
     FVC-0.179-0.078-0.263-0.177-0.079-0.133-0.209-0.038-0.009-0.111-0.161-0.407*
     DLCO0.0620.157-0.365-0.269-0.1540.0200.041-0.0250.239-0.227-0.288-0.224
     RV-0.170-0.095-0.024-0.1120.0480.035-0.227-0.025-0.069-0.1380.0090.009
     TLC-0.1490.155-0.056-0.020-0.268-0.270-0.2190.1960.147-0.038-0.041-0.113
     RV/TLC0.170-0.0920.187-0.1790.1910.450*0.118-0.1480.0390.0510.1200.321
     PEF0.0850.215-0.153-0.015-0.235-0.152-0.0440.0600.028-0.121-0.140-0.280
     MEF75%0.0720.266-0.0550.084-0.002-0.155-0.0330.0600.021-0.1330.013-0.478*
     MEF50%0.0480.201-0.067-0.1120.015-0.243-0.0180.037-0.004-0.259-0.043-0.533*
     MEF25%-0.1520.199-0.2140.024-0.162-0.180-0.2380.012-0.176-0.201-0.174-0.479*
     注:* 为P<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  C组各肺野SSD、LAV% 与肺功能指标的相关性分析

    Table  5.   Analysis of correlation between SSD and LAV% of the lung field and lung function indexes in group C

    C组右上右中右下左上左中左下
    SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%SSDLAV%
     FEV10.324-0.453*0.242-0.435*-0.126-0.555*0.030-0.575*0.053-0.554*0.149-0.519*
     FEV1%0.302-0.513*0.209-0.420*-0.007-0.532*0.076-0.552*0.068-0.581*0.205-0.389*
     FVC-0.1380.010-0.181-0.086-0.284-0.2050.036-0.137-0.042-0.156-0.102-0.291
     DLCO0.338-0.2820.511*-0.506*0.420*-0.503*0.395-0.3260.492*-0.523*0.648*-0.410*
     RV-0.3580.065-0.3150.2210.2600.347-0.1910.268-0.1990.490*-0.563*0.325
     TLC-0.033-0.2850.0430.085-0.362-0.110-0.248-0.414*-0.136-0.203-0.136-0.233
     RV/TLC0.1500.0420.0480.130-0.1340.2110.2420.1510.1970.2990.1150.332
     PEF0.250-0.535*0.069-0.324-0.211-0.469*-0.111-0.575*-0.069-0.476*0.003-0.530*
     MEF75%0.161-0.498*-0.036-0.297-0.266-0.423*-0.199-0.529*-0.178-0.395-0.053-0.496*
     MEF50%0.136-0.376-0.077-0.229-0.338-0.329-0.201-0.367-0.153-0.286-0.139-0.431*
     MEF25%0.040-0.312-0.031-0.202-0.377-0.298-0.221-0.306-0.114-0.239-0.141-0.404*
     注:* 为P<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 韩欢, 徐绍德. 胸部多排螺旋CT扫描诊断职业性尘肺病的效果及准确率分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2021,5(8): 64−65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2021.08.030

    HAN H, XU S D. Analysis of effect and accuracy of multi-slice spiral CT in the diagnosis of occupational pneumoconiosis[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Applications, 2021, 5(8): 64−65. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2021.08.030
    [2] JONES C M, PASRICHA S S, HEINZE S B, et al. Silicosis in artificial stone workers: Spectrum of radiological high-resolution CT chest findings[J]. Journal Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 2020, 64(2): 241−249. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13015
    [3] PEREZ T, GARCIA G, ROCHE N, et al. Société de pneumologie de langue française. Recommandation pour la pratique clinique. Prise en charge de la BPCO. Mise à jour 2012. Exploration fonctionnelle respiratoire. Texte long [French Pulmonary Medicine Society. Guidelines for clinical practice. Management of COPD. Update 2012: Pulmonary function tests: Full length text][J]. Revue Des Maladies Respiratoires, 2014, 31(3): 263−294. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2013.11.007
    [4] 刘阿茹, 魏华, 邓永红. HRCT肺气肿定量分析与COPD患者疾病相关性分析[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2021,19(8): 74−76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2021.08.024.

    LIU A R, WEI H, DENG Y H. Analysis of correlation between quantitative analysisi of HRCT emphysema and COPD patients[J]. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 2021, 19(8): 74−76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2021.08.024. (in Chinese).
    [5] 卞明敏, 胡茂能. 职业性尘肺病肺部影像表现与肺功能改变关系的研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2021,39(5): 519−523. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2021.05.008.

    BIAN M M, HU M N. Study on the relationship pulmonary imaging manifestations and pulmonary function changes in occupational pnuemoconiosis[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2021, 39(5): 519−523. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2021.05.008. (in Chinese).
    [6] ZAPOROZHAN J, LEY S, EBERHARDT R, et al. Paired inspiratory/expiratory volumetric thin-slice CT scan for emphysema analysis: Comparison of different quantitative evaluations and pulmonary function test[J]. Chest, 2005, 128(5): 3213−3220.
    [7] 张雨洁, 俞同福. COPD患者肺气肿程度对气道径线与肺功能相关性的影响[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2016,32(7): 1028−1032. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2016.07.009.

    ZHANG Y J, YU T F. Infiuence of the degree of emphysema on the correlation between airway line and lung function in COPD patients[J]. Journal of Applied Radiology, 2016, 32(7): 1028−1032. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2016.07.009. (in Chinese).
    [8] VOGELMEIER C F, CRINER G J, MARTINEZ F J, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report: GOLD executive summary[J]. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017, 49(6): 557−582.
    [9] GBZ70-2015, 职业性尘肺病的诊断[S].
    [10] 翟荣存, 李年春, 刘晓东, 等. 尘肺病小阴影密集度的CT分级方法及参考片探讨[J]. 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志, 2021,39(6): 453−457. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20200917-00537.

    ZHAI R C, LI N C, LIU X D, et al. Discussion on CT grading method of small shadow density in pneumoconiosis and refernce film[J]. Chinese Journal of Labor Health and Occupational Diseases, 2021, 39(6): 453−457. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20200917-00537. (in Chinese).
    [11] MASHIMO S, CHUBACHI S, TSUTSUMI A, et al. Relationship between diminution of small pulmonary vessels and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Clinical Imaging, 2017, 46: 85−90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.008
    [12] 余先超, 王朗, 温晓玲, 等. CT肺容积及肺密度与尘肺肺功能的相关性[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2020,28(11): 846−848, 851. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2020.11.012.

    YU X C, WANG L, WEN X L, et al. Correlation of lung volume and lung density with pneumoconiosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging, 2020, 28(11): 846−848, 851. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2020.11.012. (in Chinese).
    [13] 王雷, 沈聪, 邹常咏, 等. 基于CT定量评估肺气肿肺叶分布特点与肺功能的相关性[J]. 西安交通大学学报(医学版), 2018,39(6): 902−906. DOI: 10.7652/jdyxb201806026.

    WANG L, SHEN C, ZOU C Y, et al. Quantitative evealuation of the correlation between pulmonary lobe distribution characteristics and lung function in emphysema based on CT[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Medical Edition), 2018, 39(6): 902−906. DOI: 10.7652/jdyxb201806026. (in Chinese).
    [14] 兰长青, 王洁, 黄梅萍, 等. CT肺气肿指数及空间分布对慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺损伤的评估价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2021,32(5): 320−325. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2021.05.004.

    LAN C Q, WANG J, HUANG M P, et al. Evaluation of CT emphysema index and its spatial distribution in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medical Imaging, 2021, 32(5): 320−325. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2021.05.004. (in Chinese).
    [15] 王岩. 探析多层螺旋CT及后处理功能对早期尘肺诊断的应用价值[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2020,26(8): 151−152. DOI: 10.15971/j.cnki.cmdi.2020.08.076.

    WANG Y. Application of multislice spiral CT and post-processing in early diagnosis of pneumoconiosisi[J]. China Medical Device Information, 2020, 26(8): 151−152. DOI: 10.15971/j.cnki.cmdi.2020.08.076. (in Chinese).
    [16] 胡必锋, 朱胜康, 翟荣存, 等. CT小阴影密集度判定方法及参考片在矽肺诊断中的应用[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2021,55(11): 1172−1177. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20210201-00085.

    HU B F, ZHU S K, ZHAI R C, et al. Determination of small shadow intensity in CT and application of reference film in diagnosis of silicosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2021, 55(11): 1172−1177. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20210201-00085. (in Chinese).
    [17] 夏养萱, 张健杰, 朱德香, 等. 尘肺病患者胸部螺旋CT影像与肺功能变化研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2016,30(4): 267−269, 274. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2016.04.001.

    XIA Y X, ZHANG J J, ZHU D X, et al. Study on spiral CT imaging of chest and pulmonary function in patients with pneumoconiosis[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2016, 30(4): 267−269, 274. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2016.04.001. (in Chinese).
    [18] CHAMPLIN J, EDWARDS R, PIPAVATH S. Imaging of occupational lung disease[J]. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 2016, 54(6): 1077−1096. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.05.015
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  209
  • HTML全文浏览量:  96
  • PDF下载量:  13
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-11-23
  • 录用日期:  2022-03-28
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-04-13
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回