ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P

肝脏MR四种扫描序列比较

刘建新, 贾绍田, 邓刚, 王军, 常鑫, 童双立

刘建新, 贾绍田, 邓刚, 王军, 常鑫, 童双立. 肝脏MR四种扫描序列比较[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2000, 9(2): 33-36.
引用本文: 刘建新, 贾绍田, 邓刚, 王军, 常鑫, 童双立. 肝脏MR四种扫描序列比较[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2000, 9(2): 33-36.
Liu Jianxin, Jia Shaotian, Deng Gang, Wang Jun, Chang Xin, Tong Shuangli. Comparison of Four MR Scanning Sequence for Liver[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2000, 9(2): 33-36.
Citation: Liu Jianxin, Jia Shaotian, Deng Gang, Wang Jun, Chang Xin, Tong Shuangli. Comparison of Four MR Scanning Sequence for Liver[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2000, 9(2): 33-36.

肝脏MR四种扫描序列比较

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘建新 男 1963-03月出生;大专毕业。1984年参加工作,先后在中日友好医院,煤炭总医院放射科工作,主管技师:曾发表有关影像技术文章多篇。

Comparison of Four MR Scanning Sequence for Liver

  • 摘要: 目的探讨肝脏MR扫描序列的最佳选择。方法对29例患者采用四种(SE、FLASH、Tse11,Tse23)扫描序列进行肝脏MR扫描,测量和计算图像的信噪比(SNR)和对比度噪声比(CNR),同时对影像进行视觉评价。结果FLASH和TSE23序列优片率高于SE和Tse11序列:T1加权像中FLASH序列的SNR和CNR均优于SE序列;T2加权像中Tse23序列的SNR和CNR均不及Tse11序列。结论肝脏MR扫描FLASH序列可作为首选,Tse23序列作为辅助使用。
    Abstract: Purpose: To study the best MR sequence for liver examination. Methods: Scanning 29 patient's liver with four sequence (SEMSH, Tse11, Tse23),measure and calculate Ihe SNR and CNRmeanwhile evaluate the images with vision. Results: The first-string film ratio of FLASH and Tse23 aresuperior to that of SE and Tse11 sequence; On T1 weighted images, the SNR and CNR of FLASH is superiorto that of SE sequence,on T2 weighted images, the SNR and CNR of Tse23 is lower than Tse11 saquence.Conclusion : The FLASH sequence is the first choice for liver MR examination and the Tse23 sequence canassist it to get more information.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1688
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  1999-12-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-12-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭