ISSN 1004-4140
    CN 11-3017/P

    PI-RADS v2.1联合PSA相关指标预测PSA灰区前列腺癌的价值研究

    Study on the Value of Predicting Prostate Cancer in the Grey Zone of PSA by Use of PI-RADS v2.1 Combined with PSA-related Indicators

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨建立前列腺影像报告及数据系统(PI-RADS v2.1)联合前列腺抗原(PSA)相关衍生物的Logistic模型对PSA灰区(4~10ng/mL)前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断价值。材料与方法:回顾性分析经病理证实的49例前列腺癌(PCa)和118例非癌患者的资料,包括年龄、tPSA、fPSA、PI-RADS v2.1评分、PSAD、fPSA/tPSA。对组间有统计学差异的指标进行Logistic回归分析,确定PCa独立预测指标,并分别联合PI-RADS v2.1评分建立Logistic回归预测模型。通过受试者工作特性曲线(ROC)评价各模型的诊断效能。结果:①年龄、tPSA、fPSA在PCa与非癌组间无统计学差异,fPSA/tPSA、PSAD、PI-RADS v2.1评分有统计学差异。②Logistic回归分析显示PI-RADS v2.1评分、PSAD、fPSA/tPSA为PCa独立预测因子;拟建立预测模型,A模型:Logit(P)=-10.82+2.32×PI-RADS v2.1+11.89×PSAD;B模型:Logit(P)=-6.13+2.19×PI-RADS v2.1-12.02×fPSA/tPSA。ROC曲线下面积分别为0.918和0.893,均高于单独使用PI-RADS v2.1评分,差异具有统计学意义。其中A模型敏感度0.843、特异度0.829,较单独使用PI-RADS v2.1评分(敏感度0.767、特异度0.801)诊断效能最佳。结论:PI-RADS v2.1评分联合PSA相关指标建立的Logistic模型在PSA灰区前列腺癌的诊断效能均优于单独运用PI-RADS v2.1评分,能够避免不必要的穿刺活检,对优化临床治疗策略具有较好的指导作用。

       

      Abstract: Objective: We intend to investigate the diagnostic value of establishing the Logistic regression model based on Prostate Imaging Report and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1) combined with prostate specific antigen (PSA) which is applied in PSA gray area(4~10ng/mL) prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the pathologically-certified clinical data of 49 cases with prostate cancer (PCa) and 118 non-cancer cases who underwent prostate biopsy, the data covered age, tPSA, fPSA, PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation, PSAD and fPSA/tPSA. We performed logistic regression analysis on the indicators with statistical difference between the groups, and obtained ascertained independent PCa predictors, furthermore we respectively established regression prediction model by combination with PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation. The diagnostic efficacy of each model was evaluated by the operating characteristic curve (ROC) of subjects. Results: (1) There was no significant statistical difference in age, tPSA and fPSA between the PCa and non-cancer patients. But evaluation of PI-RADS v2.1, fPSA/tPSA, and PSAD showed significant statistical differences. (2) Logistic regression analysis indicated that PI-RADS v2.1evaluation, PSAD, and fPSA/tPSA are independent predictors of PCa; we established prediction models A and B as follows;Model A: Logit (P)=-10.82+2.32×PI-RADS v2.1+11.89×PSAD; Model B: Logit (P)=-6.13+2.19×PI-RADS v2.1-12.02×fPSA/tPSA. The area under the ROC curve was respectively 0.918 and 0.893, both were higher than the PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation independently applied, and we found that the differences were statistically significant. The sensitivity of model A was 0.843 and the specificity was 0.829, which showed better diagnostic efficacy compared with the sensitivity and specificity we got when the PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation was independently used (sensitivity 0.767 and specificity 0.801).Conclusion: The Logistic model established by combing PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation with PSA-related indicators showed better diagnostic efficacy in PSA grey area prostate cancer than PI-RADS v2.1 applied independently, in this way unnecessary needle biopsy can be avoided, and would play a significant instructive role in optimizing clinical treatment strategies.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回