ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
CUI Xu-ran, HUO Guo-dong, ZHENG Xiao-xue. Elastic Impedance Parameters Extraction Based on Accumulation Method[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2015, 24(2): 177-189. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2015.24.02.04
Citation: CUI Xu-ran, HUO Guo-dong, ZHENG Xiao-xue. Elastic Impedance Parameters Extraction Based on Accumulation Method[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2015, 24(2): 177-189. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2015.24.02.04

Elastic Impedance Parameters Extraction Based on Accumulation Method

More Information
  • Received Date: January 27, 2015
  • Available Online: December 05, 2022
  • It's significant to extract underground media information for reservoir prediction from elastic impedance. While traditional extraction methods are mostly based on least squares theory, in this paper accumulation method is brought in to extract parameters from elastic impedance. Both methods are applied on a four-layer model and part of Marmousi 2 model to extract P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity and density from elastic impedance which contains Gaussian distribution background noise and uniform distribution background noise respectively. According to the quantitative comparison, the accuracy of the two methods ale approximate. Conclusion can be drawn that accumulation method is feasible and effective to extract parameters from elastic impedance.
  • Related Articles

    [1]FANG Fang, HU Shaoping. Comparative Analysis of MRI Findings and Pathology in Acoustic Neuroma[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(6): 731-738. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.06.11
    [2]SI Youqiang, GUO Runhua, SHI Pengcheng. Comparative Study of Signal Time-Frequency Analysis Techniques Based on EMD,EEMD and CEEMD[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(4): 417-426. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.04.02
    [3]WANG Hui, LIU Hong, HUANG Hai-dong, ZHAO Rui. Comparative Analysis of MSCT Features and Pathology of Ground-glass Nodules of Lung Adenocarcinomas[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2018, 27(1): 93-99. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2018.27.01.12
    [4]YU Bei, LI Ya-chao. Comparative Analysis of the Diagnosis Value Using Ultrasound and CT in Benign and Malignant of Thyroid Nodules[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2015, 24(6): 849-855. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2015.24.06.11
    [5]XIA Shu-lin, LUO Hui-jun, YI Jiao-e, CHENG Xiao-guang. Radiologic Signs Comparative Analysis of Osseous Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2015, 24(5): 717-724. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2015.24.05.09
    [6]QIANG Jian-ke, XIAO Jun-ping. Analysis of Stratigraphic Resolution with the Current Parameter in Electric Logging[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2014, 23(1): 65-70.
    [7]ZHENG Jian, YU Hang, KUAI Duo-jie, LIU Zhao-bang, DONG Yue-fang, ZHANG Tao. Comparative Analysis of Reconstruction Algorithms for Multi-slice Clinical CT[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2012, 21(4): 677-687.
    [8]LÜ Guo-shi, WANG De-ren, YUN Hao, ZUO Hong. Comparing Features of Different Location of Ependymomas on MR Imaging[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2006, 15(4): 48-53.
    [9]YUAN Ming-kai, LIU Li. Comparative Analysis of FBP and OSEM Reconstruction Methods in Industrial CT[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2006, 15(1): 56-60.
    [10]Zheng Zhenmu, Huang Shaoming, Wu Xibing, Zhu Jie. Comparative Analysis of Preoperative Computed Tomography of Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma and Surgical Resection[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2000, 9(2): 14-15.

Catalog

    Article views (727) PDF downloads (4) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return