ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
CHEN Yuexi. Diagnostic Value of MSCT in Extrapancreatic Nerve Infiltration of Pancreatic Cancer[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 761-767. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.12
Citation: CHEN Yuexi. Diagnostic Value of MSCT in Extrapancreatic Nerve Infiltration of Pancreatic Cancer[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 761-767. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.12

Diagnostic Value of MSCT in Extrapancreatic Nerve Infiltration of Pancreatic Cancer

More Information
  • Received Date: June 03, 2021
  • Available Online: November 03, 2021
  • Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in extrapancreatic nerve infiltration of pancreatic cancer. Methods: We compared the morphology, size and CT value of celiac ganglia between 20 patients with pancreatic carcinoma and 50 healthy people. Taking the pathological results as the standard, we analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of MSCT in diagnosing the celiac ganglia invasion. Results: In the pancreatic cancer group, the shape of abdominal ganglion was coarse strip, and the fat gap between the tumor and the abdominal ganglion was unclear. The shape of abdominal ganglion in healthy control group was fine strip or small nodular, and the surrounding fat gap was clear. The long diameter and short diameter of bilateral abdominal ganglions in the pancreatic cancer group were higher than those in the healthy group, while the three-phase CT values of left abdominal ganglion in the pancreatic cancer group were higher than those in the healthy group. Compared with the pathological results, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of abdominal ganglion invasion in pancreatic cancer were 80%, 60% and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: MSCT holds high diagnostic value for extrapancreatic nerve infiltration, which can clearly show the morphology, size and CT value of abdominal ganglion. The circumstances of thick-strip enlargement of abdominal ganglion, unclear fat gap and occurrence of obvious enhancement indicate the nerve invasion of the existing tumor.
  • [1]
    SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, JEMAL A. Cancer statistics, 2019[J]. Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2019, 69(1):7-34.
    [2]
    ILIC M, ILIC I. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, 22(44):9694-9705.
    [3]
    LI X, MA G, MA Q, et al. Neurotransmitter substance P mediates pancreatic cancer perineural unvasion via NK-1R in cancer cells[J]. Molecular Cancer Research, 2013, 11(3):294-302.
    [4]
    WANG X, ZHANG H, WANG T, et al. The concept and controversy of retroperitoneal nerve dissection in pancreatic head carcinoma (Review)[J]. International Journal of Oncology, 2015, 47(6):2017-2027.
    [5]
    GUO K, MA Q, LI J, et al, Interaction of the sympathetic nerve with pancreatic cancer cells promotes perineural invasion through the activation of STAT3 signaling[J]. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 2013, 12(3):264-273.
    [6]
    MOCHIZUKI K, GABATA T, KOZAKA K, et al. MDCT findings of extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion by pancreas head carcinoma:Correlation with en bloc pathological specimens and diagnostic accuracy[J]. European Radiology, 2010, 20(7):1757-1767.
    [7]
    LIEBIG C, AYALA G, WILKS J A, et al. Perineural invasion in cancer:A review of the literature[J]. American Cancer Society, 2009, 115:3379-3391.
    [8]
    CAPARELLO C, VIVALDI C, FORNARO L, et al. Second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer:Evaluation of prognostic factors and review of current literature[J]. Future Oncology, 2016, 12(7):901-908.
    [9]
    MURAKAMI Y, SATOI S, SHO M, et al. National comprehensive cancer network resectability status for pancreatic carcinoma predicts overall survival[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2015, 39(9):2306-2314.
    [10]
    ZHANG X M, MI TCHELL DG, WI TKIEWICZ A, et al. Extrapancreatic neural plexus invasion by pancreatic carcinoma:Characteristics on magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2009, 34:634-641.
    [11]
    ZHANG X M, ZHAO Q H, ZENG N L, et al. The celiac ganglia:Anatomic study using MRI in cadavers[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2006, 186:1520-1523.
    [12]
    蒋奎荣, 时国东, 苗毅. 胰腺癌神经侵犯的研究进展[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 27(2):81-83.
    [13]
    赵琼惠, 张小明, 曾南林, 等. 尸体标本腹腔神经节的CT解剖[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2005, 39(3):317-319.

    ZHAO Q H, ZHANG X M, ZENG N L, et al. Anatomic study of celiac ganglia using CT in cadavers[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2005, 39(3):317-319.(in Chinese).
    [14]
    HARINCK F, KONINGS I C, KLUIJT I, et al. A multicentre comparative prospective blinded analysis of EUS and MRI for screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals[J]. Gut, 2016, 65(9):1505-1513.
    [15]
    WANG Z J, WEBB E M, WESTPHALEN A C, et al. Multi-detector row computed tomographic appearance of celiac ganglia[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2010, 34:343.
    [16]
    CHEN F M, NI J M, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Presurgical evaluation of pancreatic cancer:A comprehensive imaging comparison of CT versus MRI[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2016, 206(3):526-535.
    [17]
    YANG Y H, LIU J B, GUI Y, et al. Relationship between autophagy and perineural invasion, clinicopathological features, and prognosis in pancreatic cancer[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017, 23(40):7232-7241.
    [18]
    王润景, 杜美玲, 付元山, 等. 胰腺癌神经浸润机制研究进展[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2019, 41(3):254-258.

    WANG R J, DU M L, FU Y S, et al. Research progress on neural invasion mechanisms in pancreatic cancer[J]. Journal of Dalian Medical University, 2019, 41(3):254-258. (in Chinese).
    [19]
    冯广龙, 姜慧杰, 李金平, 等. 多层螺旋CT增强扫描在胰腺癌术前诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(11):838-842.

    FENG G L, JIANG H J, LI J P, et al. Value of multi-slice spiral CT in preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2017, 97(11):838-842. (in Chinese).
    [20]
    杨延辉, 张玉祥, 桂洋, 等. 胰腺癌与自噬、神经浸润的关系[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34(11):2475-2479.

    YANG Y H, ZHANG Y X, GUI Y, et al. Reaearch advances in the role of autophagy and perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatol, 2018, 34(11):2475-2479. (in Chinese).
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 李春涛,左新会,王化凡. MRI常规成像序列结合DWI对直肠癌术前TN分期的诊断价值. 深圳中西医结合杂志. 2022(15): 57-59 .
    2. 赵兰空,宫鹏飞,王静. 磁共振不同序列对直肠癌环周切缘诊断价值. 新疆医学. 2021(04): 431-434 .
    3. 孟成立,丁利平,钱伟军. 扩散加权成像联合磁共振成像平扫在直肠癌术前T分期诊断中的应用价值. 河南医学研究. 2021(12): 2265-2267 .
    4. 宋新宇. MRI-DWI技术在直肠癌术前分期诊断中的应用. 航空航天医学杂志. 2021(10): 1206-1207 .
    5. 董雷. 凡士林灌注直肠MRI高分辨扫描技术诊断直肠癌的临床应用. 结直肠肛门外科. 2021(S2): 17-18 .
    6. 张永萍. MRI在直肠癌诊断及术前分期中的应用. 内蒙古医学杂志. 2020(04): 438-439+515 .
    7. 龙艳,高志霖,罗平,严珏玺,邓开闯,梁海峰,王代顺. 直肠系膜筋膜MRI薄层检查对直肠癌邻近浸润的临床价值分析. 基层医学论坛. 2019(01): 1-3 .
    8. 肖琳,欧荣册. 磁共振扩散加权成像ADC值与直肠癌分化程度及T分期的相关性分析. 中国CT和MRI杂志. 2019(08): 137-139 .
    9. 冯超,卢方明,李晓军,李晓敏. 探讨高分辨MRI对直肠癌术前T、N分期及环周切缘评估的准确性. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(68): 189-190 .
    10. 刘鹏,李海英,张玫,王小琦,刘晓东,彭小娟,李晓琴,弥海宁,郑鹏. 磁共振高分辨T_2WI及功能成像对直肠癌的应用研究. 甘肃医药. 2019(06): 491-494 .
    11. 霍鹏,单秋旺,李琳琳,赵靖,王宏斌,孙秀娟. 1.5T磁共振成像与128层CT在直肠癌术前肠周脂肪浸润诊断中的价值比较. 癌症进展. 2019(19): 2339-2342 .
    12. 赵辉. 高分辨MRI联合DWI对直肠癌患者T分期诊断准确率的影响. 首都食品与医药. 2019(23): 108 .
    13. 张霖,王小红,张可名,李丽. 高分辨MRI双重造影结合DWI对直肠癌术前分期体会. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(A5): 170+190 .
    14. 黄志成,郑君,叶钉利,孙双燕. MRI不同技术对直肠癌术前分期的临床价值分析. 中国继续医学教育. 2018(07): 44-45 .
    15. 徐晔,周洋,唐娜,张修石. 中段直肠癌术前磁共振成像对术后复发及转移的预测价值研究. 中国癌症杂志. 2018(05): 376-382 .
    16. 张洪彬,张静,孟爽,张矗阁,朱渊东,范新华. 直肠癌术前分期应用高分辨率MRI技术的临床价值. 浙江创伤外科. 2018(04): 832-834 .
    17. 刘鹏,彭小娟,王小琦. 磁共振成像在直肠癌中的应用进展. 肿瘤学杂志. 2018(12): 1210-1215 .
    18. 丛刊,张志达,吕兴隆. 高分辨MRI对直肠癌术前T、N分期及环周切缘评估的准确性分析. 中国继续医学教育. 2017(12): 75-76 .
    19. 戴纪男. 高分辨率MRI检查诊断直肠癌淋巴结转移及分期的准确性. 影像研究与医学应用. 2017(16): 104-105 .
    20. 肖寒冰,黎雪梅,叶贱辉,郑益红,刘金生,何文俊. 磁共振3D SPACE序列联合DWI序列在直肠癌术前分期中的应用价值探讨. 中国当代医药. 2017(33): 60-62 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (292) PDF downloads (19) Cited by(25)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return