ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
Volume 31 Issue 3
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
FANG S, CHEN L Y, CHEN Y, et al. Phantom study on the influence of CT model and tube voltage on image quality[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(3): 345-350. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.042. (in Chinese)
Citation: FANG S, CHEN L Y, CHEN Y, et al. Phantom study on the influence of CT model and tube voltage on image quality[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(3): 345-350. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.042. (in Chinese)

Phantom Study on the Influence of CT Model and Tube Voltage on Image Quality

doi: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.042
  • Received Date: 2021-11-21
  • Accepted Date: 2021-12-23
  • Available Online: 2021-12-28
  • Publish Date: 2022-05-23
  • Objective: To compare the image quality between two CT scanners under two different tube voltages using a dedicated phantom. Materials and Methods: Siemens SOMATOM Force CT and Phillips Spectral IQon CT were used for scanning and the dedicated Assurance Quality Phantom Catphan 500 was applied. Module CTP 528 and CTP 515 were performed for evaluation of high resolution and low-contrast sensitivity, respectively. Four sets of images of two scanners were acquired, including group A to D whic represented force 120 kVp, force 140 kVp, IQon 120 kVp and IQon 140 kVp. The dosage of all four set of images was 20mGy.Evaluation of high resolution was carried out by two radiologists via the smallest line pair one could distinguish and low-contrast sensitivity was measured by the smallest diameter under 1% contrast. Mean noise, signal-to -oise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also evaluated for each group. Results: Group A and C had the highest high resolution with a line pair of 6 lp/cm; the same low-contrast sensitivity was observed by all the groups (diameter of 5 mm). Group A showed the smallest noise (2.500±0.000) and highest SNR (30.806±1.398). Noise and SNR were both significantly different among four groups. The highest CNR (3.325±0.300) was observed in Group D, but no statistical difference was found among the four groups. Conclusion: Image quality varied under different CT scanners and tube voltages. Images with 120 kVp showed better contrast compared with those with 140 kVp. 120 kVp with force CT showed improved image noise than that of 140 kVp images; while for IQon spectral CT, no obvious difference in noise parameters was found between the two tube voltages.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    HRICAK H, BRENNER D J, ADELSTEIN S J, et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: A multifaceted challenge[J]. Radiology, 2011, 258(3): 889−905. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101157
    [2]
    SCHLAPPER G. Advances in radiation protection in medicine[J]. Nuclear Technology, 1982, 59(3): 541−542. doi: 10.13182/NT82-A33013
    [3]
    SMITH-BINDMAN R, LIPSON J, MARCUS R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer[J]. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2009, 169(22): 2078−2086. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427
    [4]
    MATHEWS J D, FORSYTHE A V, BRADY Z, et al. Cancer risk in 680000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: Data linkage study of 11 million Australians[J]. British Medical Journal, 2013, 346: f2360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2360
    [5]
    PEARCE M S, SALOTTI J A, LITTLE M P, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Lancet, 2012, 380(9840): 499−505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
    [6]
    de GONZALEZ A B, DARBY S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: Estimates for the UK and 14 other countries[J]. Lancet, 2004, 363(9406): 345−351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0
    [7]
    余滔, 单华, 姜文雯. 低剂量对比剂联合低监测阈值在头颈部CTA中的应用[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2019,28(4): 455−461. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.04.06.

    YU T, SHAN H, JIANG W W. Application of low-dose contrast agent combined with low monitoring threshold in head and neck CTA[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(4): 455−461. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.04.06. (in Chinese).
    [8]
    刘进, 赵倩隆, 尹相瑞, 等. 基于特征学习的低剂量CT成像算法研究进展[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2019,28(3): 393−406. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.03.14.

    LIU J, ZHAO Q L, YIN X R, et al. Research progress of low-dose CT imaging algorithms based on feature learning[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(3): 393−406. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.03.14. (in Chinese).
    [9]
    LI B, POMERLEAU M, GUPTA A, et al. Accuracy of dual-energy CT virtual unenhanced and. material-specific images: A phantom study[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2020, 215(5): 1146−1154. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22372
    [10]
    BAERENDS E, OOSTVEEN L J, SMIT C T, et al. Comparing dual energy CT and subtraction CT on a phantom: Which one provides the best contrast in iodine maps for sub-centimetre details?[J]. European Radiology, 2018, 28(12): 5051−5059. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5496-x
    [11]
    EULER A, SOLOMON J, MAZUROWSKI M A, et al. How accurate and precise are CT based measurements of iodine concentration? A comparison of the minimum detectable concentration difference among single source and dual source dual energy CT in a phantom study[J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29(4): 2069−2078. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5736-0
    [12]
    LENNARTZ S, PARAKH A, CAO J, et al. Inter-scan and inter-scanner variation of quantitative dual-energy CT: Evaluation with three different scanner types[J]. European Radiology, 2021, 31(7): 4438−4451. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07611-0
    [13]
    MASJEDI H, ZARE M H, SIAHPOUSH N K, et al. European trends in radiology: Investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose[J]. La Radiologia Medica, 2019, 125(3): 296−305.
    [14]
    雷勇, 陈自谦, 钱根年, 等. MSCT参数优化和图像质量的相关性研究[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2014,29(1): 32−35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2014.01.008

    LEI Y, CHEN Z Q, QIAN G N, et al. Research on the correlation between MSCT parameter optimization and image quality[J]. China Medical Equipment, 2014, 29(1): 32−35. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2014.01.008
    [15]
    杜云, 吴琼. 不同管电压对头颈CTA图像质量及辐射剂量的影响分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2021,5(12): 140−141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2021.12.069

    DU Y, WU Q. Analysis of the influence of different tube voltages on the image quality and radiation dose of head and neck CTA[J]. Image Research and Medical Applications, 2021, 5(12): 140−141. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2021.12.069
    [16]
    隋岩, 杨德武. CT对胸部体模内病灶的检出率: 不同扫描条件的对比研究[J]. 放射学实践, 2020,35(4): 552−554.

    SUI Y, YANG D W. CT detection rate of lesions in the chest phantom: A comparative study of different scanning conditions[J]. Radiology Practice, 2020, 35(4): 552−554. (in Chinese).
    [17]
    王贤坤, 邹才盛. 不同管电压对头颈CTA图像质量及辐射剂量的影响分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2019,3(5): 21−23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2019.05.012

    WANG X K, ZOU C S. Analysis of the influence of different tube voltages on the image quality and radiation dose of head and neck CTA[J]. Image Research and Medical Applications, 2019, 3(5): 21−23. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2019.05.012
    [18]
    WELLENBERG R H, BOOMSMA M F, van OSCH J A, et al. Quantifying metal artifact reduction using virtual monochromatic dual-layer detector spectral CT imaging in unilateral and bilateral total hip prostheses[J]. European Journal Radiology, 2017, 88: 61−70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.002
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(215) PDF Downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return