ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
LIU Z Y, DING W, MA Z P, et al. Optimization of Acquisition Phase and Acquisition Time Window of Coronary Artery CT Angiography with Different Heart Rates[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(3): 439-445. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.202. (in Chinese).
Citation: LIU Z Y, DING W, MA Z P, et al. Optimization of Acquisition Phase and Acquisition Time Window of Coronary Artery CT Angiography with Different Heart Rates[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(3): 439-445. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.202. (in Chinese).

Optimization of Acquisition Phase and Acquisition Time Window of Coronary Artery CT Angiography with Different Heart Rates

More Information
  • Received Date: September 18, 2024
  • Available Online: January 24, 2025
  • This study aimed to determine the optimal reconstruction phase and acquisition time window for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with different heart rates, by exploring the effect of the optimized scanning time window on image quality and radiation dose. One thousand patients who underwent CCTA were divided into groups A and B and were divided into nine subgroups based on their heart rate at the time of CCTA. Group A individuals underwent CCTA within a single cardiac cycle, and the optimal reconstruction phase at each heart rate was identified based on image quality. The individuals in group B were examined using the optimized scanning window in group A. Some patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and the results were used as the gold standard. The image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic efficiency were compared between the two groups. The findings indicated that the A1~A9 subgroups' optimal reconstruction phases were: 61%~85% RR interval; 68%~84% RR interval; 70%~82% RR interval and 34%~46% RR interval; 70%~82% RR interval and 34%~46% RR interval; 70%~82% and 36%~48% RR interval; 65%~89% and 38%~50% RR interval; 68%~84% RR interval and 36%~56% RR interval; 38%~54% RR interval; and 38%~58% RR interval. There were no significant differences in the subjective score and sensitivity and specificity of CCTA in the assessment of coronary artery stenosis between the two groups. The average effective dose (ED) in Group B was 40.17% lower than that in Group A. Narrowing the acquisition time window can lower the radiation dose of CCTA inspection while maintaining image quality.

  • [1]
    BAUERSACHS R, ZEYMER U, BRIèRE J B, et al. Burden of coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease: A literature review[J]. Cardiovascular Therapeutics, 2019, 2019: 8295054. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8295054.
    [2]
    中华医学会放射学分会心胸学组. 心脏冠状动脉CT血管成像技术规范化应用中国指南[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2017, 51(10): 732-742. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2017.10.004.
    [3]
    SOSCHYNSKI M, HAGAR M T, TARON J, et al. Update for the performance of CT coronary angiography-evidence-based application and technical guidance according to current consensus guidelines and practical advice from the clinical routine[J]. Fortschr Röntgenstr, 2022, 194(6): 613-624. DOI: 10.1055/a-1747-3554.
    [4]
    RICHARDS C E, OBAID D R. Low-dose radiation advances in coronary computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease[J]. Current Cardiology Reviews, 2019, 15(4): 304-315. DOI: 10.2174/1573403X15666190222163737.
    [5]
    冯梦雅, 李冰, 吴敏, 等. 基于AI的新迭代重建算法与低管电压在降低肥胖患者冠状动脉CTA辐射剂量中的应用[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2023, 32(6): 777-782. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.148.

    FENG M Y, LI B, WU M, et al. Application of new iterative reconstruction algorithm based on artificial intelligence and low tube voltage in reducing the radiation dose of intelligence and low tube voltage in reducing the radiation dose of coronary CTA in obese patients[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2023, 32(6): 777-782. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.148. (in Chinese).
    [6]
    INFANTE T, Del VISCOVO L, De RIMINI M L, et al. Network medicine: A clinical approach for precision medicine and personalized therapy in coronary heart disease[J]. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 2020, 27(4): 279-302. DOI: 10.5551/jat.52407.
    [7]
    BENZ D C, ERSöZLü S, MOJON F L A, et al. Radiation dose reduction with deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography[J]. European Radiology, 2022, 32(4): 2620-2628. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08367-x.
    [8]
    YAN C, LIU J, MIN J, et al. Radiation dose and image quality of coronary CT angiography performed with whole-heart coverage CT scanner with 0.25 s rotation time in patients with irregular heart rhythm[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(4): e25320. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25320.
    [9]
    YYANG C C, LAW W Y, LU K M, et al. Relationship between heart rate and optimal reconstruction phase in coronary CT angiography performed on a 256-slice multidetector CT[J]. British Journal of Radiology, 2019, 92(1101): 20180945. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180945.
    [10]
    张卓璐, 李少朕, 洪楠, 等. 采集时间窗对冠状动脉CT图像质量及辐射剂量的影响[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2019, 38(2): 338-341. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2019.02.039.

    ZHANG Z L, LI S Z, HONG N, et al. Effect of acquisition window on image quality and radiation dose in coronary computed tomography angiography[J]. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 2019, 38(2): 338-341. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2019.02.039. (in Chinese).
    [11]
    LI W, YOU Y, ZHONG S, et al. Image quality assessment of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for low dose aortic CTA: A feasibility study of 70 kVp and reduced contrast medium volume[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2022, 149: 110221. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110221.
    [12]
    刘军波, 范丽娟, 周伟, 等. 不同心率单个心动周期冠状动脉CT成像质量和辐射剂量研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2019, 39(2): 150-154. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2019.02.013.

    LIU J B, FAN L J, ZHOU W, et al. Investigation of image quality and radiation dose of coronary CT angiography in a single cardiaccycle with different heart rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2019, 39(2): 150-154. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2019.02.013. (in Chinese).
    [13]
    TRIDANDAPANI S, BANAIT-DESHMANE S, AZIZ M U, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography: A review of the techniques, protocols, pitfalls, and radiation dose[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 2021, 52(3S): S1-S11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.08.014.
    [14]
    MUSHTAQ S, CONTE E, MELOTTI E, et al. Coronary CT angiography in challenging patients: High heart rate and atrial fibrillation[J]. Academic Radiology, 2019, 26(11): 1544-1549. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.01.022.

Catalog

    Article views (47) PDF downloads (13) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return