ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
XIA Zhen-ying, CHEN Feng, LI Hong-jun. Influence of Different Injection Rates of Contrast Medium with 64-slice Helical CT on Effect of Liver Arterial Phase Enhanced Scanning[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2012, 21(1): 89-96.
Citation: XIA Zhen-ying, CHEN Feng, LI Hong-jun. Influence of Different Injection Rates of Contrast Medium with 64-slice Helical CT on Effect of Liver Arterial Phase Enhanced Scanning[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2012, 21(1): 89-96.

Influence of Different Injection Rates of Contrast Medium with 64-slice Helical CT on Effect of Liver Arterial Phase Enhanced Scanning

More Information
  • Received Date: October 26, 2011
  • Available Online: December 09, 2022
  • Objective: To discuss the influence of different injection rates of contrast medium with 64-slice helical CT on effect of liver arterial phase enhanced scanning.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients for abdominal CT enhanced scanning.All patients were divided into two groups,the normal group(A group) and the cirrhosis group(B group),each group had 40 cases.According to the injection rate of contrast medium,each group was divided into 2 groups,the 3.5 mL/s group(group A1,B1) and 2.5 mL/s group(group A2,B2).Using Smartprep tracking technology of contrast medium,when the abdominal aorta CT value reached or exceeded 150 Hu,pressed the scan button and began formal scan.Under different injection rate of contrast medium,the peak enhancement of abdominal aorta and trigger time of arterial phase were measured.Recorded good and excellent rats of normal and cirrhotic group,then compared statistical results.Results: When the injection rate of contrast medium was 3.5 mL/s and 2.5 mL/s,The good and excellent rates of normal group was 96.4% and 91.7% respectively,P>0.05,and that of cirrhosis group was 95.5% and 72.2% respectively,P<0.05.When injection rate of contrast medium was 2.5 mL/s,the mean peak enhancement of abdominal aorta in normal and the liver cirrhosis group were 196.40 Hu ±20 Hu and 186.02 Hu ±18 Hu respectively,P>0.05;arterial phase average trigger time of normal group and cirrhosis group was 22 seconds and 24 seconds respectively,P<0.05.When the injection rate of contrast medium was 3.5 mL/s,the mean peak enhancement of abdominal aorta in normal group and cirrhosis group were 244.90 Hu ±37 Hu and 219.33 Hu ±33 Hu respectively,P<0.05;the average trigger time of arterial phase in normal group and the liver cirrhosis group was 20 seconds and 22 seconds respectively,P<0.05.Conclusion: The injection rate of contrast medium is faster,the arterial phase peak is higher,the triggering time is shorter.In the same injection rate,the mean peak enhancement of abdominal aorta of normal group is higher than that of cirrhosis group,and the average trigger time is shorter than that of cirrhosis group.Liver cirrhosis group needs higher speed on injection than normal group.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Yunfu, KANG Tianliang, ZHANG Yongxian, LI Wei, XU Qinggang, WANG Xinyan, XIAN Junfang, NIU Yantao. Study of Two-stage Injection of Contrast Agent in Combination with Bolus Tracking Technique in Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2023, 32(4): 531-538. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2023.075
    [2]WANG Yongsheng, WANG Chensi, LU Haoyu, TIAN Xiangbao, ZHUANG Qixin. Study on the Value of Individualized Contrast Agent Injection Scheme in Improving the Biosafety of Pulmonary Artery CTA[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 777-783. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.14
    [3]FU Chuanming, CHEN Lungang, CHEN Wen, XU Lin, WANG Sirong. Research on the Contrast Medium's Best Injection Combined with Low Tube Voltage in Aortic CTA[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(4): 447-454. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.04.05
    [4]CAO Hong-wei, XING Yuan-yuan, CHOU Heng-zhi, ZHANG Dan, CAO Zhen-dong, WAN Li-ye, WANG Sheng-lin. The Effect of Contrast Medium Injection Rate on the Image Quality of Inferior Vena Cava Direct CTV[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2017, 26(6): 775-782. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2017.26.06.15
    [5]FU Chuan-ming, ZHANG Hai-bo, CHEN Lun-gang, XU Lin, WANG Kai-hua, WU De-hong. Reduced Contrast Dose CTPA in the Feasibility Study[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2013, 22(1): 121-127.
    [6]ZHU Ting-ting, GAN Wan-chong. Contrast Quantity and Injection Velocity in Cerebral Angiography with 64 Multi-Detector CT[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2009, 18(4): 109-114.
    [7]FAN Xu, GUO Zhi-rui, CAO Min, ZHOU Xue-feng, GU Ning. Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography Based on Gold Nanoparticles[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2009, 18(4): 15-25.
    [8]GAO Wen-jie, HUO Jian-wei, DOU Xiu-mei, LI Xia. Ulrich Contrast Medium Injector in 64 Row of Spiral CT Inspection Application[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2006, 15(3): 50-52.
    [9]LIU Ying, ZHANG Xiu-li, ME Gang. Application of 16-slice Spiral CT Angiography(CTA) with Tracking Technology of Contrast Medium in lower extremity[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2006, 15(3): 31-34.
    [10]Li Ronghuan, Li Jinzhi, Li Xinhua, Zhang Haining, Cui Wenguo. Prevention and Management of Side-effect of Contrast Media in CT Enhancemant Scan[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2000, 9(3): 20-22.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 孟宪鑫,王栋,庞华军,徐瑞辰. CT纹理分析对腮腺肿瘤良恶性的鉴别价值. 影像研究与医学应用. 2024(15): 68-70 .
    2. 茅枭骁,马树声,卢亮,施久刚,张磊. 基于增强CT纹理分析联合机器学习鉴别腮腺腺淋巴瘤与混合瘤. CT理论与应用研究. 2023(01): 74-80 . 本站查看
    3. 刘利群,徐伟辉. 针刺治疗腮腺多形性腺瘤术后面神经麻痹. 光明中医. 2023(10): 1935-1938 .
    4. 罗威,彭川. CT在腮腺良恶性肿物的诊断价值. 现代医用影像学. 2023(06): 1034-1037+1041 .
    5. 李文鑫,杨慧敏,郭兰田. 影像组学在腮腺肿瘤鉴别中的研究进展. 影像研究与医学应用. 2023(18): 4-6 .
    6. 徐海侠. 基于HRCT图像的纹理分析技术在鉴别肺肉瘤样癌与腺癌的价值. 现代医用影像学. 2021(02): 294-296+300 .
    7. 苑子茵,郑宁,邵硕. 影像组学在唾液腺疾病中的应用. 济宁医学院学报. 2021(03): 217-220+224 .
    8. 杨振兴,郝粉娥,赵磊,杨晓光,刘挨师. 腮腺良性肿瘤容积穿梭CT灌注时间-密度曲线特征分析. CT理论与应用研究. 2021(05): 575-582 . 本站查看
    9. 高华,刘丽,范铁. 腮腺多形性腺瘤临床分析. 中国实用医药. 2021(33): 84-86 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (1393) PDF downloads (2) Cited by(13)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return