ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
CAO Juntao, CHEN Qiqi, HU Ming, XU Ting, TU Jianchun, ZHANG Huan. A Preliminary Analysis of Using the Sinogram-affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Strength Levels based on the Original Data of Low-dose Chest CT to Evaluate Different Types of Small Pulmonary Nodules[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 735-742. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.09
Citation: CAO Juntao, CHEN Qiqi, HU Ming, XU Ting, TU Jianchun, ZHANG Huan. A Preliminary Analysis of Using the Sinogram-affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Strength Levels based on the Original Data of Low-dose Chest CT to Evaluate Different Types of Small Pulmonary Nodules[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 735-742. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2021.30.06.09

A Preliminary Analysis of Using the Sinogram-affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Strength Levels based on the Original Data of Low-dose Chest CT to Evaluate Different Types of Small Pulmonary Nodules

More Information
  • Received Date: April 06, 2021
  • Available Online: November 03, 2021
  • Objective: We intend to explore the Corresponding relations between the Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) strength levels and the optimized display of different types (solid, partially solid, and pure ground glass) of small pulmonary nodules in low-dose chest CT (LDCT). Materials and methods: We analyzed 105 small pulmonary nodules in 101 patients who underwent LDCT from September 2020 to January 2021 and also met the criteria for small pulmonary nodules. Based on nodule composition, they were divided into the solid nodule Group (n=27), the partially solid nodule group (n=37) and the pure ground glass nodule group (n=41). First we adopted the one-way analysis of variance, Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis H test to analyze the general data in groups, then took the filtered back projection algorithm (FBP, B50f) as the reference to compare the difference in objective image quality (including noise value, CT value of small pulmonary nodules, SNR and CNR) and subjective image quality in groups under different SAFIRE modes (I50f and I70f, strength levels 1 to 5 respectively).Results: 1 There was no significant difference in gender, body mass index, and nodule distribution in three groups. The age and length of the nodules in the pure ground-glass nodule group were smaller than those in the solid and partial solid nodule groups; 2 The image noise values in SAFIRE I50f 1-5 and I70f-5 were lower than that in FBP B50f while SAFIRE I50f-5 showed the lowest noise value. There was no significant difference in CT values of small pulmonary nodules in the three groups under different modes, the SNR and CNR of small pulmonary nodules in SAFIRE I50f-5 were higher than those of FBP B50f and other SAFIRE modes; 3 SAFIRE I50f 3~5 of solid and partial solid pulmonary nodule groups obtained higher subjective scores than that of FBP B50f and other SAFIRE modes except I70f-5. SAFIRE I50f-4 of pure ground glass nodule group obtained a higher subjective score than those of FBP B50f and other SAFIRE modes except I50f-3 and I50f-5, and there was no significant difference in the subjective scores in three groups under this mode (P=0.428). Conclusion: SAFIRE I50f-4 performed well and displayed a balanced effect in the objective and subjective evaluation of solid, partial solid and pure ground glass small pulmonary nodules in LDCT. We suggest it can be applied to evaluate different types of small pulmonary nodules in LDCT.
  • [1]
    CHEN W, ZHENG R, BAADE P D, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA:A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2016, 66(2):115-32.
    [2]
    赫捷, 里霓, 陈万青, 等. 中国肺癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2021, 北京)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2021, 43(3):243-268.

    DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210119-00060. HE J, LI N, CHEN W Q, et al. China guideline for the screening and early detection of lung cancer(2021, Beijing)[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2021, 43(3):243-268. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210119-00060. (in Chinese).
    [3]
    中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺癌学组, 中国肺癌防治联盟专家组. 肺结节诊治中国专家共识(2018年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2018, 41(10):763-771.
    [4]
    MACMAHON H, NAIDICH D P, GOO J M, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images:From the fleischner society 2017[J]. Radiology, 2017, 284:228-243.
    [5]
    de JONG P A, LEINER T, LAMMERS J W, et al. Can low-dose unenhanced chest CT be used for follow-up of pulmonary nodules?[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2012, 199(4):777-780.
    [6]
    National Pulmonary Screening Trial Research Team, ABERLE D R, ADAMS A M, et al. Reduced pulmonary-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2011, 365(5):395-409.
    [7]
    JIN S, ZHANG B, ZHANG L, et al. Pulmonary nodules assessment in ultra-low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction compared to conventional dose CT[J]. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2018, 8(5):480-490.
    [8]
    王海燕. SAFIRE迭代重建技术在低剂量胸部CT检查中的临床应用研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2014. Wang H Y. Application study of Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction on low dose chest CT[D]. Ji'nan:Shandong University, 2014. (in Chinese).
    [9]
    SWENSEN S J, JETT J R, HARTMAN T E, et al. Pulmonary cancer screening with CT:Mayo Clinic experience[J]. Radiology, 2003, 226(3):756-761.
    [10]
    YANG W, QIAN F, TENG J, et al. Community-based pulmonary cancer screening with low-dose CT in China:Results of the baseline screening[J]. Lung Cancer, 2018, 117:20-26.
    [11]
    HOREWEG N, VAN ROSMALEN J, HEUVELMANS M A, et al. Pulmonary cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules:A prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening[J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2014, 15:1332-1341.
    [12]
    中华医学会放射学分会心胸学组. 低剂量螺旋CT肺癌筛查专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2015, (5):328-335.
    [13]
    赵子健, 李若梅, 苏祝平, 等. LDCT平扫联合ASiR算法在新型冠状病毒肺炎检查中的应用价值[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2020, 41(7):69-72

    , 92. ZHAO Z J, LI R M, SU Z P, et al. Application value of LDCT combined with ASiR algorithm for diagnosing COVID-19[J]. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal, 2020, 41(7):69-72, 92. (in Chinese).
    [14]
    WILLEMINK M J, NOËL P B. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence[J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29(5):2185-2195.
    [15]
    WANG G, YU H, DE MAN B. An outlook on X-ray CT research and development[J]. Medical physics, 2008, 35(3):1051-1064.
    [16]
    STILLER W. Basics of iterative reconstruction methods in computed tomography:A vendorindependent overview[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2018, 109:147-154.
    [17]
    AHN H, LEE K H, KIM J, et al. Diameter of the solid component in subsolid nodules on Low-dose unenhanced chest computed tomography:Measurement accuracy for the prediction of invasive component in pulmonary adenocarcinoma[J]. Korean Journal of Radiology, 2018, 19(3):508-515.
    [18]
    张可名, 王小红, 孙世元, 等. SAFIRE迭代重建技术在肺磨玻璃密度结节低剂量高分辨率CT检查中的应用[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36(11):2736-2738.
    [19]
    MIRONOVA V, BLASBERG J D. Evaluation of ground glass nodules[J]. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 2018, 24(4):350-354.
    [20]
    MILANESE G, SILVA M, FRAUENFELDER T, et al. Comparison of ultra-low dose chest CT scanning protocols for the detection of pulmonary nodules:A phantom study[J]. Tumori Journal, 2019, 105(5):394-403.
    [21]
    朱熹, 夏巍, 周中柱, 等. 低剂量CT不同重建技术对计算机辅助诊断肺结节的影响[J]. 放射学实践, 2019, 34(11):1255-1259.

    ZHU X, XIA W, ZHOU Z Z, et a1. Effect of different reconstruction techniques on computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT[J]. Radiology Practice, 2019, 34(11):1255-1259. (in Chinese).
    [22]
    CHRISTE A, HEVERHAGEN J, OZDOBA C, et al. CT dose and image quality in the last three scanner generations[J]. World Journal of Radiology, 2013, 5(11):421-429.
    [23]
    GEYER L L, SCHOEPF U J, MEINEL F G, et al. State of the art:Iterative CT reconstruction techniques[J]. Radiology, 2015, 276(2):339-357.
    [24]
    LAURENT G, VILLANI N, HOSSU G, et al. Full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in abdominal CT increases objective image quality, but decreases subjective acceptance[J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29(8):4016-4025.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Yuxin, WEI Jiaotong, ZHAO Xiaojie, CHEN Ping, PAN Jinxiao. A Correction Method for Hardening Artifacts in CT Images Based on Integral Invariance[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(4): 571-579. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2025.064
    [2]SU Danyang, HOU Ping, ZHANG Haoran, MA Yuanbo, LIU Jinlong, YANG Xiaopeng. Research Progress on Reducing Metal Artifacts in CT Imaging[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(3): 499-505. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.023
    [3]LIU Xiangcheng, HUANG Xiaoying, WEI Pengyue, WANG Pengchao, GUO Fangkai, BAO Yunfeng. Clinical Research Progress on Deep Learning for Metal Artifact Reduction in CT Images[J]. CT Theory and Applications. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2025.222
    [4]WEI Pengyue, HUANG Xiaoying, WU Tong, GUO Fangkai, GUAN Jing, BAO Yunfeng. Effect of denture materials on CT image artifacts: phantom experiment[J]. CT Theory and Applications. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.339
    [5]LIU Bicheng, YI Xi, ZONG Chunguang, XU Yanwei, LI Liang. Ring-artifact Correction Method for Large-size Object CT Images Based on Gradient Featured Cluster Analysis[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(6): 781-789. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.153
    [6]ZUO Shunji, FENG Peng, HUANG Pan, YAN Shenghao, HE Peng, WEI Biao. Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm for CT Images of Rock and Mineral Samples Based on Dual-domain Adaptive Network[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(6): 783-792. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.041
    [7]ZHAO Qingqing, SUN Xiaoli, LI Xi, WANG Yanwen, LIU Weina, DUAN Yongli, WANG Rengui. Utility of Spectral CT Monochromatic Imaging with Metal Artifacts Reduction (MAR) for the Reduction of Metal Artifacts of Embolization Coil Implants[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(5): 529-539. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.02
    [8]ZHANG Xue-song, ZHAO Bo-shan. Cupping Artifacts Calibration in CT Image Based on Radon Transform[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2016, 25(5): 539-546. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2016.25.05.05
    [9]CHAI Jia-bin, LI Gong-ping, WEI Cun-feng, WEI Long, YU Yang, WANG Qian, LIU Bao-dong. Metal Artifacts Correction Method Research about Liquid Metal Angiography[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2016, 25(2): 149-157. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2016.25.02.04
    [10]LI Qing-liang, YAN Bin, SUN Hong-sheng, LI Lei, ZHANG Feng. Review of Metal Artifacts Correction Methods on X-ray Computed Tomography[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2011, 20(1): 131-140.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 曹家晟,李保磊. 光子计数X射线CT能量成像精度影响因素分析. CT理论与应用研究(中英文). 2025(02): 255-262 .
    2. 沈龙,王晨,杨启楠. 能谱CT对长骨外伤性骨髓水肿诊断及图像质量分析. 中国CT和MRI杂志. 2025(05): 159-161+180 .
    3. 郭杰,蔡爱龙,王少宇,郑治中,李磊,闫镔. 光子计数探测器投影数据噪声的p-范分布统计分析. 光学学报. 2024(03): 102-110 .
    4. 赵利军,曹聪颖,张晋京,赵杰,陈彬涛,王安红. 压缩图像增强方法研究综述. 计算机工程与应用. 2023(21): 26-38 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (292) PDF downloads (31) Cited by(10)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return