ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
NI X L, ZHOU F Y, SHI Z, et al. Study on the Radiation Dose Distribution of Abdominal CT Scans Based on Dose Simulation Humans[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(6): 808-814. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.087. (in Chinese).
Citation: NI X L, ZHOU F Y, SHI Z, et al. Study on the Radiation Dose Distribution of Abdominal CT Scans Based on Dose Simulation Humans[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(6): 808-814. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.087. (in Chinese).

Study on the Radiation Dose Distribution of Abdominal CT Scans Based on Dose Simulation Humans

More Information
  • Received Date: June 06, 2024
  • Revised Date: August 19, 2024
  • Accepted Date: August 21, 2024
  • Available Online: October 07, 2024
  • Objective: This study aimed to systematically measure and analyze the radiation dose distribution in the abdomen and specific areas of interest on the body surface during abdominal CT scans using a dose simulation phantom, providing relevant data to assess patient radiation risks and to develop personalized radiation protection strategies. Methods: The study simulated routine clinical abdominal CT using a dose simulation phantom. Forty-two tissue detection points and eight surface points on the phantom were selected to represent major organs in the trunk and key areas of concern on the body surface. RGD-3B thermoluminescence was used to measure the dose level of the main organs and key parts of the body surface. Results: Experimental data from the dose simulation phantom were analyzed and indicated that the stomach received the highest radiation dose at 15.9 mGy, followed by the kidneys and pancreas, at 15.7 mGy and 14.4 mGy, respectively. The doses for the adrenal glands, gallbladder, and left lobe of the liver were 14.3, 13.2, and 12.9 mGy, respectively. All other areas received doses < 6.9 mGy. Surface area dose measurements showed that the left and right eye lens received a dose of 0.017 and 0.029 mGy, respectively. The dose for the thyroid was 0.062 mGy and 0.057 mGy on the left and right sides, respectively. The doses to the left and right breasts were 1.71 mGy and 1.58 mGy, respectively. The gonads received doses of 0.145 mGy and 0.090 mGy on the left and right sides, respectively. The skin entry dose at the lower edge of the breast, which is near the skin during CT scans, was between 1 and 2 mGy. Conclusion: During abdominal CT, the stomach, kidneys, and pancreas received the highest radiation doses. Although the radiation dose of sensitive areas on the body surface is lower, that in the thyroid, gonads, and lens remain higher than that in other surface tissues. These findings suggest that workers may need further protection in specific high-dose areas to reduce potential radiation hazards.

  • [1]
    张智, 汤淳清, 杨柯, 等. 安徽三所医院胸部CT检查的辐射剂量调查[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2022, 6(13): 19−21, 24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2022.13.007.

    ZhANG Z, TANG C Q, YANG K, et al. Radiation dose investigation of chest CT examination in three hospitals in Anhui province[J]. Imaging Research and Medical Application, 2022, 6(13): 19−21, 24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2022.13.007. (in Chinese).
    [2]
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2020 report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation[R]. New York: United Nations, 2020.
    [3]
    张玉珩, 陈英民, 陈睿, 等. 仿真儿童体模头部CT检查剂量及屏蔽防护效果研究[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2020, 29(1): 21−25.

    ZHANG Y H, CHEN Y M, CHEN R, et al. Study on CT dose and shielding effect of simulated body model head of children[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Health, 2020, 29(1): 21−25. (in Chinese).
    [4]
    赵小爱, 徐丽, 金秀花. 个人剂量监测中异常结果的调查与分析[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2021, 30(5): 587−591.

    ZHAO X A, XU L, JIN X H. Investigation and analysis of abnormal results in individual dose monitoring[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Health, 2021, 30(5): 587−591. (in Chinese).
    [5]
    杜翔, 徐小三, 杨春勇, 等. 江苏省CT扫描检查中受检者剂量调查与分析[J]. 江苏预防医学, 2021, 32(3): 290−292, 295.

    DU X, XU X S, YANG C Y, et al. Investigation and analysis of patient dose during CT scan in Jiangsu province[J]. Jiangsu Preventive Medicine, 2021, 32(3): 290−292, 295. (in Chinese).
    [6]
    赵徵鑫, 王海华, 钱前, 等. 探究4种临床CT扫描方式对受检者辐射剂量的影响及胸部扫描辐射场的空间分布[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2022, 31(4): 437−442.

    ZHAO Z X, WANG H H, QIAN Q, et al. To explore the effect of 4 kinds of clinical CT scanning methods on the radiation dose of subjects and the spatial distribution of radiation field in chest scanning[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Health, 2022, 31(4): 437−442. (in Chinese).
    [7]
    杨世芳. 探讨低剂量对比剂和低X线辐射量CT尿路成像的可行性[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2019, 28(10): 2257−2258. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2019.10.041.

    YANG S F. Study on the feasibility of low dose contrast agent and low X-ray radiation amount CT urography[J]. Journal of Modern Medical Imaging, 2019, 28(10): 2257−2258. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7035.2019.10.041. (in Chinese).
    [8]
    杨红云, 李海亮, 杨淑慧, 等. 五种头颅CT扫描方式受检者眼晶体受照剂量的测量及比较[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2019, 28(2): 148−151, 154.

    YANG H Y, LI H L, YANG S H, et al. Measurement and comparison of eye lens exposure dose of subjects with five head CT scanning methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Health, 2019, 28(2): 148−151, 154. (in Chinese).
    [9]
    DELIN C, SILVER S, BASSINT C, et al. Ionizing radiation doses during lower limb torsion and anteversion measurements by EOS stereoradiography and computed tomography[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2014, 83(2): 371−377. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.026.
    [10]
    肖丹. 辐射剂量与放射源在线监测管理平台[R]. 哈尔滨, 黑龙江省科学院技术物理研究所, 2019-07-26.

    XIAO D. Online monitoring and management platform for radiation dose and radioactive source[R]. Haerbin, Institute of Technical Physics, Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences, 2019-07-26. (in Chinese).
    [11]
    王亮, 彭勇, 刘怡, 等. 医院级CT辐射剂量及诊断剂量水平研究[J]. 辐射防护, 2019, 39(6): 517−521.

    WANG L, PENG Y, LIU Y, et al. Study on radiation dose and diagnostic dose level of hospital-grade CT[J]. Radiation Protection, 2019, 39(6): 517−521. (in Chinese).
    [12]
    EEDO M, MORI S, KANDATSU S, et al. Development and performance evaluation of the second model 256-detector row CT[J]. Radiological Physics and Technology, 2008, 1(1): 20−26. DOI: 10.1007/s12194-007-0004-z.
    [13]
    HIGASHIGAITO K, BECKER A S, SPERNGEL K, et al. Automatic radiation dose monitoring for CT of trauma patients with different protocols: Feasibility and accuracy[J]. Clinical Radiology, 2016, 71(9): 905−911. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.04.023.
    [14]
    COUSINS C, MILLER D L, BERNARDI G, et al. ICRP publication 120: Radiological protection in cardiology[J]. Annals of the ICRP, 2013, 42(1): 1−125. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.09.001.
    [15]
    MIYAZAKI S , HILL C. General tissue reactions and implications for radiation protection[J]. Annals of the ICRP, 2015, 44(S1): 76-83. DOI: 10.1177/0146645314560689.
    [16]
    井赛, 张谷敏, 孙旭, 等. CT辐射剂量检测仿真人体模的研制[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2017, 38(11): 31−34.

    JING S, ZHANG G M, SUN X, et al. Development of simulated human body model for CT radiation dose detection[J]. Medical & Health Equipment, 2017, 38(11): 31−34. (in Chinese).
    [17]
    GRAJO J R, SAHANI D V. Dual-energy CT of the abdomen and pelvis: Radiation dose considerations[J]. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2018, 15(8): 1128−1132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.012.
    [18]
    ASCENTI G, MAZZIOTEI S, MILET A O, et al. Dual-source dual-energy CT evaluation of complex cystic renal masses[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2012, 199(5): 1026−1034. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7711.
    [19]
    SHUMAN W P, GREEN D E, BUSEY J M, et al. Dual-energy liver CT: Effect of monochromatic imaging on lesion detection, conspicuity, and contrast-to-noise ratio of hypervascular lesions on late arterial phase[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2014, 203(3): 601−606. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11337.
    [20]
    王策, 周凤云, 轩艳姣, 等. 患者双下肢X射线一次性曝光中性腺受照剂量测量与分析[J]. CT理论与应用研究(中英文), 2024, 33(5): 627−632. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2023.171.

    WANG C, ZHOU F Y, XUAN Y J, et al. Measurement and analysis of gonadal irradiation dose during singe-shot X-ray exposure of both lower limbs[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(5): 627−632. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2023.171. (in Chinese).
  • Related Articles

    [1]PAN Zhijie, LIU Ling, LI Qingyao, QU Tingting, ZHANG Shuai, XIE Xueqian. Deep Learning Image Reconstruction to Improve Computed Tomography Image Quality of the Phantom with Standard Liver Density[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2025, 34(4): 677-685. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.056
    [2]XIE Ruigang, WANG Siyan, AN Hengbin, SU Tao, SUN Minghua. Impact of Electrocardiogram Gating Technology on Radiation Dose in Dual-source Computed Tomography High Pitch Spiral Scanning Using a Phantom[J]. CT Theory and Applications. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.300
    [3]LIU Kang, YANG Dewu, ZHANG yongxian, LIU dandan, GAI xinghui, CHEN zhaorui, GONG hao, SUI Yan. Impact of Different Scanning Modes and Noise Index on Inner Ear CT Image Quality and Radiation Dose[J]. CT Theory and Applications. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.230
    [4]ZHANG Bin, KUI Xueyan, LIAO Jianyong, WANG Xu, NIE Wenhuan, FENG Hongjie, MA Yanli, WANG Wenwu, ZHANG Yongxian. Investigation and Analysis of Radiation Dose in Adult Head and Chest CT Examinations at Primary Healthcare Institutions in a Suburban District of Beijing[J]. CT Theory and Applications. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.351
    [5]MA Tian, LI Fang, ZHOU Yan, XU Yinghao, HE Yi. A Phantom Experimental Study on Improving the Imaging Quality of Stent CT at a Fast Heart Rate[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(5): 594-600. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.021
    [6]LIU Qiang, ZENG Yongming, SUN Jingkun, LOU Hao, XIA Xianmei, GE Bing, ZHOU Yu, ZHENG Yue. Analysis of Influencing Factors on Pulmonary Nodule Detection by Computed Tomography with Artificial Intelligence: A Phantom Study[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(4): 471-477. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2023.190
    [7]FANG Shu, CHEN Linyu, CHEN Yong, DONG Haipeng, WANG Lan, MIN Jihua. Phantom Study on the Influence of CT Model and Tube Voltage on Image Quality[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(3): 345-350. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021.042
    [8]LIU Huan, FU Quan-hai, CHEN Xiao-Zhao, HOU Yao-fang, SUN Zhi-yong, KANG Yan. Design and Evaluation of Dental CT Test Phantom[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2014, 23(6): 959-966.
    [9]WANG Xian-gang, ZHANG Chao-zong, GUO Zhi-ping. Automatic Method of Rotation Center Determination with Hough Transform and Thin Cylinder Phantom[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2010, 19(4): 1-6.
    [10]Jiang Hsieh, John Londt, Melissa Vass, Xiangyang Tang, Jay Li, Darin Okerlund. Low-dose CT Cardiac Imaging[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2007, 16(2): 52-59,65.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (140) PDF downloads (23) Cited by(1)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return