ISSN 1004-4140
CN 11-3017/P
JIAO Yan, ZHANG Dan, LI Gaoyang, LI Guiping, WU Weina. Study on the Relationship between Cartilage Injury of Knee Tibiofemoral Joint and Joint Axis Angle[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(1): 53-60. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.01.06
Citation: JIAO Yan, ZHANG Dan, LI Gaoyang, LI Guiping, WU Weina. Study on the Relationship between Cartilage Injury of Knee Tibiofemoral Joint and Joint Axis Angle[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(1): 53-60. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.01.06

Study on the Relationship between Cartilage Injury of Knee Tibiofemoral Joint and Joint Axis Angle

More Information
  • Received Date: July 18, 2018
  • Available Online: November 05, 2021
  • Objective: To investigate the relationship between cartilage injury of knee tibiofemoral and femoral angle, tibial angle, femorotibial angle and joint space angle of knee joint. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 587 patients who underwent knee joint MRI examination in the Southern Hospital of Chengde Medical College from January 2017 to June 2017. 100 patients in the case group and 100 patients in the control group were randomly selected through inclusion and exclusion criteria. The femoral angle, tibial angle, femorotibial angle and joint space angle were measured in two groups, and the correlation angle data were statistically analyzed by SPSS19.0. The statistical methods included rank sum test, Spearman correlation test and ROC curve. Results: The femur angle, tibial angle, femorotibial angle and joint space angle of the case group were 83.22 (81.85 to 84.40) degrees, 95.60 (94.10 to 96.87) degrees, 179 (177.50 to 180.25) degrees and 1.92 (1.43 to 2.43) degrees, respectively. The femoral angle, tibial angle, femur tibial angle and joint clearance angle of the control group were 82.50 (81.70 to 83.60) degrees, 94.25 (93.20 to 95.52) degrees, 177.20 (175.90 to 178.17) degrees and 175.90 (0.50 to 0.95) degrees. There were significant differences in tibial angle, femorotibial angle and joint space angle between the two groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in femoral angle (P>0.05), cartilage injury was positively correlated with the joint space angle (rs=0.852, P<0.001), but not with tibial angle and femorotibial angle. The optimal threshold value, sensitivity and specificity of tibial angle were 95.15 degrees, 56% and 72%, respectively. The optimum critical value, sensitivity and specificity of femorotibial angle were 179.05 degrees, 49% and 92% respectively, and the optimum critical value, sensitivity and specificity of joint space angle were 1.255 degrees, 84% and 96%, respectively. Conclusion: The increase of tibial angle, femorotibial angle and joint space angle will affect the tibiofemoral joint cartilage and lead to the injury of tibiofemoral joint cartilage. And with the increase of joint space angle, the injury degree of the tibiofemoral joint cartilage is aggravated.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Ran, YANG Jian, CHEN Yue, WANG Wei, LAN Jiujun, CHEN Junrong. Correlation Between MRI Changes and Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2024, 33(5): 601-608. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.024
    [2]SHEN Xiaojun, LU Yuhua, LIANG Zonghui. Diagnosis of Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma with Enhanced MRI Examination: A Clinical Case Analysis[J]. CT Theory and Applications. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2024.090
    [3]SHEN Le, LU Qian, TANG Hu, WU Sha, YI Yi, SUN Yunda, QIU Qian, ZHANG Li, ZHENG Zhuozhao, CAI Xu. A Feasibility Study of Knee Joint Semantic Segmentation on 3D MR Images[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(5): 531-542. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.091
    [4]LIU Mengke, LI Xingpeng, ZHANG Yan, HAO Qi, SUN Xiaoli, LI Bin, WANG Rengui. Study on the Staging of Primary Lower Extremity Lymphedema Based on Calf Soft-tissue Thickness Measurement by MRI[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2022, 31(4): 479-487. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2022.100
    [5]CHEN Yunhui, YANG Yaying, PENG Chao, HU Juan. Advances in CT and MRI Monitoring of Crohn's Disease[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2021, 30(6): 785-791. DOI: 10.15953/j.ctta.2021-001
    [6]LV Xuefei, HU Shaoping. A Preliminary Study on the Correlation between MRI Diffusion Characteristics and HER-2 Expression in Female Breast Cancer[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2020, 29(5): 584-590. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2020.29.05.09
    [7]LI Rui, FENG Feng. Research Progress of MRI in Brain Metastasis[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2019, 28(5): 631-639. DOI: 10.15953/j.1004-4140.2019.28.05.14
    [8]SUN Qi-feng. The Frequency-Space Domain Depth Migration Based on Arbitrarily Wide-Angle Wave Equation[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2010, 19(2): 17-24.
    [9]FANG Ting-song, PENG Jia-you, ZHAO Xiao-mei, QIN Hong-wei. Optimization of a 3D FLASH Water Excitation MRI Sequence for the Visualization of Articular Cartilage[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2009, 18(3): 79-84.
    [10]LIU Jin-cai, CHEN Hua-ping. Analysis MRI of Hemangioblastoma[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2007, 16(4): 61-65.

Catalog

    Article views (531) PDF downloads (11) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return